The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 184, Issue 4 , Pages 353-355, October 2002

A prospective review of the decline of excisional breast biopsy

Presented at the Third Annual Meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons, Boston, Massachusetts, April 24–28, 2002

  • Joseph P Crowe Jr., M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-216-445-7904; fax: +1-216-445-7653
    • The Cleveland Clinic Breast Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, A10, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
  • ,
  • Alice Rim, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • The Cleveland Clinic Breast Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, A10, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
  • ,
  • Rebecca Patrick, M.A.

      Affiliations

    • The Cleveland Clinic Breast Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, A10, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
  • ,
  • Lisa Rybicki, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • The Cleveland Clinic Breast Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, A10, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
  • ,
  • Sharon Grundfest, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • The Cleveland Clinic Breast Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, A10, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
  • ,
  • Julian Kim, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • The Cleveland Clinic Breast Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, A10, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
  • ,
  • Katherine Lee, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • The Cleveland Clinic Breast Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, A10, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
  • ,
  • Lawrence Levy, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • The Cleveland Clinic Breast Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, A10, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

Received 6 May 2002; received in revised form 27 May 2002

Abstract 

Background:

Although excisional breast biopsy has long been considered the standard for breast cancer diagnosis, core biopsies are now used more frequently. Whether core biopsy can eventually replace excisional biopsy remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between diagnostic excisional and core biopsies relative to surgical treatment procedures.

Methods

We analyzed our data collected prospectively from 1995 through 2000, which included inpatient and outpatient surgical data, office visits, and radiology biopsy data including stereotactic, mammotome, and ultrasound core biopsies. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to assess the shift in diagnostic technique.

Results

From 1995 through 2000 there were 2,631 core biopsies performed, 2,685 excisional biopsies, 2,881 surgical procedures for breast cancer, and 51,109 office visits. Although the percentage of core biopsies relative to excisional biopsies increased from 31% to 68% (P <0.001), the percentage of biopsies relative to the number of office visits remained stable at 10% to 11%. The percentage of breast cancer procedures relative to office visits also remained stable at 5% to 6%.

Conclusions

Our data indicate that core biopsies are being performed more often than excisional biopsies. Nevertheless, one in three biopsies done at our institution is excisional.

Keywords:  Breast cancer, Core breast biopsy, Excisional breast biopsy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(02)00944-3

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 184, Issue 4 , Pages 353-355, October 2002