The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 184, Issue 6 , Pages 505-508, December 2002

Is laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with mesh a reasonable alternative to conventional repair?

Presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Surgical Congress, Coronado, California, April 7–10, 2002.

  • Byron E Wright, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Hennepin County Medical Center, 701 Park Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55415-1829, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-612-347-2810; fax: +1-612-904-4297.
  • ,
  • Jason Beckerman, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Hennepin County Medical Center, 701 Park Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55415-1829, USA
  • ,
  • Melissa Cohen, M.A.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Hennepin County Medical Center, 701 Park Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55415-1829, USA
  • ,
  • John K Cumming, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Hennepin County Medical Center, 701 Park Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55415-1829, USA
  • ,
  • Jorge L Rodriguez, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Hennepin County Medical Center, 701 Park Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55415-1829, USA

Received 31 July 2002; received in revised form 18 August 2002

Abstract 

Background:

Laparoscopic mesh repair has been advocated as treatment of choice for ventral hernias. The term “ventral hernia” refers to a variety of abdominal wall defects and laparoscopic papers have not reported defect specific analysis. The purpose of this study was to determine any advantages to laparoscopic mesh repair of umbilical hernias.

Methods

A retrospective review (January 1998 to April 2001) was made of patients undergoing umbilical hernia repair. Patients were categorized into three groups: laparoscopic repair with mesh, open repair with mesh, and open repair without mesh. Comparative analysis was performed.

Results

One-hundred and sixteen umbilical hernia repairs were performed in 112 patients: 30 laparoscopic mesh repairs, 20 open mesh repairs, and 66 open nonmesh repairs. The laparoscopic technique was used for larger defects and took more time with a trend toward fewer postoperative complications and recurrences.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with mesh presents a reasonable alternative to conventional methods of repair.

Keywords:  Umbilical hernia repair, Comparison, Laparoscopic hernia repair, Mesh, Alternative repair

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(02)01071-1

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 184, Issue 6 , Pages 505-508, December 2002