The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 187, Issue 6 , Pages 702-704, June 2004

How do general surgery replacement residents match up with those recruited through the National Resident Matching Program?

  • Thomas J Leibrandt, M.A.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington, PA 19001, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-215-481-4046; fax: +1-215-481-2159
  • ,
  • John R Mehall, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington, PA 19001, USA
  • ,
  • Robert S Rhodes, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington, PA 19001, USA
  • ,
  • Jon B Morris, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington, PA 19001, USA

Received 7 July 2003; received in revised form 17 October 2003

Abstract 

Background

Although the scope and patterns of attrition of general surgery residents have been reported, no study has examined the residents who replaced them. The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of replacement residents (RRs).

Methods

A questionnaire asked program directors (PDs) about the prevalence, characteristics, and disposition of RRs in general surgery residency programs from 2001 to 2002.

Results

PDs from 169 programs (67%) responded, and 109 (64%) of these programs had RRs. Of 244 RRs (7%), 18 (7%) were postgraduate year (PGY)-1 residents; 64 (26%) were PGY-2 residents; 77 (32%) were PGY-3 residents; 52 (21%) were PGY-4 residents; and 33 (14%) were PGY-5 residents. RRs averaged 1.9 years in their programs. One hundred seventy-five (72%) came from outside the current institution, and 142 had (58%) graduated from U.S. medical schools. PDs judged RRs to be superior (20%), comparable (55%), or inferior (25%) to their peers. Neither internal recruitment nor United States medical school graduation predicted performance. Disposition included promotion and graduation (88%), leaving the program voluntarily (5%), repeating the year (4%), and dismissal (3%). Successful RR performance occurred in 71% of RRs.

Conclusions

Typically, RRs were U.S. medical school graduates, were recruited from outside the institution, and have performed satisfactorily.

Keywords:  Attrition, Resident education, Surgery

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(04)00057-1

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.10.017

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 187, Issue 6 , Pages 702-704, June 2004