The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 192, Issue 4 , Pages 509-512 , October 2006

The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery

Presented at the 7th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons, Baltimore, Maryland, April 5–9, 2006

Received 6 April 2006 ,Revised 4 June 2006

References 

  1. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel Consensus Statement . Treatment of early-stage breast cancer . J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr . 1992;11:11–15
  2. Singletary SE . Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy . Am J Surg . 2002;184:383–393
  3. Wazer DE , Jabro G , Ruthazer R , et al.   Extent of margin positivity as a predictor for local recurrence after breast conserving irradiation . Radiat Oncol Investig . 1999;7:111–117
  4. Horiguchi J , Iino Y , Takei H , et al.   Surgical margin and breast recurrence after breast-conserving therapy . Oncol Rep . 1999;6:135–138
  5. Taghian A , Mohiuddin M , Jagsi R , et al.   Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: results of a surgery . Ann Surg . 2005;241:629–639
  6. Keskek M , Kothari M , Ardehali B , et al.   Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer . EJSO . 2004;30:1058–1064
  7. Morrow M , White J , Moughan J , et al.   Factors predisposing the use of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast carcinoma . J Clin Oncol . 2001;19:2254–2262
  8. Cao D , Lin C , Woo SH , et al.   Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for re-excisions . Am J Surg Pathol . 2005;29:1625–1632
  9. Dooley WC , Parker J . Understanding the mechanisms creating false positive lumpectomy margins . Am J Surg . 2005;190:606–608
  10. Darvishian F , Hajdu SI , DeRisi DC . Significance of linear extent of breast carcinoma at surgical margin . Ann Surg Oncol . 2003;10:48–51

PII: S0002-9610(06)00430-2

doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.021

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 192, Issue 4 , Pages 509-512 , October 2006