The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 193, Issue 2 , Pages 184-189, February 2007

Rapid resolution of small-bowel obstruction with the long tube, endoscopically advanced into the jejunum

  • George F. Gowen, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-610-323-1506; fax: +1-610-327-2110

Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA, Pottstown Memorial Medical Center, 168 S. Sanatoga Rd., Pottstown, PA 19465, USA

Abstract 

Background

Long-tube decompression has achieved a 75% to 80% success rate in 5 studies, and the short tube had a 40% success rate in 3 studies.

Methods

From 1984 to 1991, an endoscope-advanced long intestinal tube was placed into the jejunum in 17 patients, and from 1992 to 2004 an improved long tube was used in 23 patients. Costs were calculated for each type of procedure.

Results

In the first group, decompression was successful in 12 of 17 patients (70%). In the second group, decompression was successful in 21 of 23 patients (90%). The average charges were as follows: for the short tube the average charge was $21,687, and for the long tube the average charge was $11,316.

Conclusions

First, by using the improved long tube, which was advanced endoscopically into the jejunum, the success rate was 90% with procedures that are standard in every hospital. Second, most patients who fail the short-tube procedure are candidates for the long tube. Third, the improved long tube, endoscopically advanced into the jejunum, is recommended strongly because it provides significant advantages, both clinically and economically, over the short-tube approach. A prospective randomized study comparing the short tube for 3 days versus the long tube for 3 days is recommended to prove the superiority of the long tube in patients with small-bowel obstruction.

Keywords: Small bowel obstruction, Adhesions, Long intestinal tube, Short tube (nasogastric tube), Upper GI endoscopy, Hospital charges

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(06)00756-2

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.11.005

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 193, Issue 2 , Pages 184-189, February 2007