The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 193, Issue 5 , Pages 600-605, May 2007

Contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging: the surgical perspective

Presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of the North Pacific Surgical Association, Spokane, WA, November 10–11, 2006

  • J. David Beatty, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Cancer Program, Swedish Cancer Institute, 1221 Madison St., Suite 400, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-206-215-6410; fax: +1-206-215-6401.
  • ,
  • Bruce A. Porter, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • First Hill Diagnostic Imaging, Seattle, WA, USA

Received 6 December 2006; received in revised form 29 January 2007

Abstract 

Background

Contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown excellent sensitivity (93%) for breast malignancies. The clinical role and value of MRI for the breast surgeon remains unresolved and controversial.

Methods

A retrospective review of clinical and imaging records was undertaken for 79 surgical patients evaluated by MRI as part of their initial assessment.

Results

Of 79 patients, 71 (90%) had dense mammograms, 64 (81%) had known primary breast cancer (BrCA), 42 (53%) had a family history of BrCA, and 8 (10%) had known breast atypia. MRI identified a larger than clinically suspected BrCA size in 10 (16%) patients and greater BrCA extent in 26 (41%) patients. Of 15 non-BrCA patients, 10 (67%) had a biopsy after the MRI with identification of BrCA in 6 (40%) patients. Overall, there were 20 MRI-initiated core biopsies, of which 14 (70%) identified BrCA. Of 70 BrCA patients, 13 (19%) had neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 35 (50%) had breast-conserving surgery, 36 (51%) had total mastectomy, and 14 (22%) had bilateral total mastectomy. MRI had good pathology correlation in 56 of 62 (90%) patients. In patients with known BrCA (by core biopsy), none of the 29 breast-conserving surgery resections undertaken after MRI had a positive margin or required re-excision.

Conclusions

MRI is very accurate for BrCA evaluation, both for lesion size and extent. With good collaboration between the radiologist and surgeon, MRI is a powerful 3-dimensional and communication tool for the breast surgeon and the patient.

Keywords: Breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, Breast cancer, Breast-conserving surgery

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(07)00104-3

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.015

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 193, Issue 5 , Pages 600-605, May 2007