The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 194, Issue 5 , Pages 594-599, November 2007

Expression patterns of lymphangiogenic and angiogenic factors in a model of breast ductal carcinoma in situ

Presented at the 31st Annual Surgical Symposium of the Association of VA Surgeons, Little Rock, AR, May 10–12, 2007

  • Minghuan Yu, Ph.D., M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Wayne State University, 6C-UHC, 4201 St. Antoine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
  • ,
  • Zhuo Tang, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Immunology, Wayne State University, 540 E. Canfield, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
  • ,
  • Sarah Alousi, B.A.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Wayne State University, 6C-UHC, 4201 St. Antoine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
  • ,
  • Richard S. Berk, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Immunology, Wayne State University, 540 E. Canfield, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
  • ,
  • Fred Miller, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Breast Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
  • ,
  • Mary Ann Kosir, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Wayne State University, 6C-UHC, 4201 St. Antoine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
    • Breast Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
    • Surgical Service, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, 4646 John R, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. VAMC (11S)/Wayne State University, 4646 John R, Detroit, MI 48201. Tel.: +1-313-576-3970; fax: +1-313-576-1002.

Received 25 May 2007; received in revised form 12 July 2007

Abstract 

Background

Foci of invasion are found in greater than 20% of excised specimens of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Since lymphangiogenesis markers are associated with the potential for increased lymph node metastasis, the purpose of the current study was to determine expression of lymphangiogenesis molecular markers in a model of aggressive DCIS.

Methods

From the MCF10A xenograft model, comedo type MCF10DCIS.com cells, premalignant MCF10AT, and invasive MCF10CA1a.cl1 cells were tested. Invasion was tested by Matrigel invasion assays (Becton-Dickinson, Bedford, MA). Gene expression was determined by reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction and protein expression by immunoblot, normalized to β-actin.

Results

MCF10DCIS.com cells were 4-fold more invasive than MCF10AT cells (P < .01), and expressed several-fold more mRNA and protein than MCF10AT and MCF10CA1a.cl1 cells for vascular endothelial growth factor C, vascular endothelial growth factor D, and lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (P < .01).

Conclusions

A subset of comedo-type DCIS cells are invasive, and expression of lymphangiogenesis markers is greater at the mRNA and protein levels than by invasive cancer cells (P < .01). These additional molecular markers may characterize aggressive DCIS more precisely.

Keywords: Ductal carcinoma in situ, Lymphangiogenesis, Vascular endothelial growth factor D

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(07)00638-1

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.007

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 194, Issue 5 , Pages 594-599, November 2007