The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 195, Issue 1 , Pages 16-19, January 2008

Patient Assessment and Management Examination: lack of correlation between faculty assessment and resident self-assessment

Presented at Annual Meeting of the Association for Surgical Education, Washington, DC, April 11–14, 2007

  • Joseph R. Schneider, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
    • Vascular and Interventional Program of Central DuPage Hospital, Winfield, IL, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-630-933-4487; fax: +1-630-933-2009.
  • ,
  • Michael J. Verta Jr, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
  • ,
  • Elizabeth R. Ryan, Ed.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
  • ,
  • Julia F. Corcoran, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
  • ,
  • Debra A. DaRosa, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

Received 18 April 2007; received in revised form 10 August 2007

Abstract 

Background

The Patient Assessment and Management Examination (PAME) is a standardized patient examination designed to assess management skills of senior residents. This study explored the relationship between faculty and resident self-evaluation by using PAME.

Methods

Nine postgraduate year (PGY) 4 and PGY5 residents were examined with a 5 case PAME. Faculty rated interactions between residents and standardized patients and residents rated themselves based on review of audio-video recordings of their interactions. We examined correlations between faculty and resident self-assessments.

Results

Faculty and resident ratings of physical examination skills was the only competency that correlated significantly. Correlations were not significant for the other 15 competencies (Pearson r, –.197 to .262). Correlation was no better when examined within each case.

Conclusions

Although PAME may be a useful tool, this study suggests that even senior residents do not assess their performance as clinicians similarly to faculty. Further research is needed to better understand the source of these disagreements.

Keywords: Performance evaluation, Standardized patients, Testing, Surgery, Assessment, Self-assessment, Patient Assessment and Management Examination, Core competency, Practice-based learning

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(07)00841-0

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.050

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 195, Issue 1 , Pages 16-19, January 2008