The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 195, Issue 4 , Pages 439-441, April 2008

External validation of prognostic models among cancer patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery

  • Tamer Ertan, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Fifth Surgery, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • Omer Yoldas, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Fifth Surgery, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +011-90 312 508 43 02; fax: +011-90 312 310 34 60.
  • ,
  • Yusuf Alper Kılıc, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • Mehmet Kılıc, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Fifth Surgery, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • Erdal Göcmen, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Fifth Surgery, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • Mahmut Koc, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Fifth Surgery, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • Mesut Tez, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Fifth Surgery, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Received 10 January 2007; received in revised form 20 March 2007 published online 28 February 2008.

Abstract 

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive accuracy of different scoring systems on patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery.

Methods

The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II or III, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, the Mortality Probability Model II, and the Colo-rectal POSSUM scoring systems were applied to 102 patients who underwent colorectal resection for cancer. Validation of scoring systems was tested by assessing calibration and discrimination. Calibration was assessed using Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and the corresponding calibration curves. Evaluation of the discriminative capability of both models was performed using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results

Overall, 17 deaths occurred. The Simplified Acute Physiology Score II showed good calibration (x2 = 1.079, P = .982) and discrimination (areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve .83).

Conclusions

These data suggest that the SAPS II scoring system was accurate in predicting outcome for patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer, Surgical mortality, Scoring systems

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(08)00002-0

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.03.012

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 195, Issue 4 , Pages 439-441, April 2008