The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 195, Issue 4 , Pages 463-466, April 2008

Is ductal evaluation always necessary before or during surgery for biliary pancreatitis?

Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Received 23 February 2007; received in revised form 5 April 2007 published online 28 February 2008.

Abstract 

Background

Whether all patients undergoing cholecystectomy following an episode of biliary pancreatitis require direct common bile duct evaluation is controversial. We hypothesized such evaluation can be omitted safely among select patients at low risk for choledocholithiasis.

Methods

One hundred forty-eight patients undergoing cholecystectomy for biliary pancreatitis (January 1995–December 2005) met the following inclusion criteria: (1) no preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); (2) normal or decreasing liver function tests (LFTs) preoperatively; and (3) no ductal dilation on non-invasive preoperative imaging. Group I had intraoperative cholangiography (IOC, n = 27); group II did not (n = 121).

Results

No differences between groups I and II were evident in postoperative retained-stone related events: recurrent pancreatitis (11% vs 8%, P = .7), cholangitis (0% in both groups), and asymptomatic LFT elevation (0% vs 3%, P > .99).

Conclusions

Direct ductal evaluation can be omitted safely in select patients undergoing cholecystectomy for biliary pancreatitis who are at low risk for choledocholithiasis.

Keywords: Biliary pancreatitis, Intraoperative cholangiography, Cholecystectomy, Choledocholithiasis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(08)00058-5

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.04.017

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 195, Issue 4 , Pages 463-466, April 2008