The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 195, Issue 6 , Pages 770-774, June 2008

Predictors of re-excision for positive or close margins in breast-conservation therapy for pT1 tumors

  • Rajeev Ramanah, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Breast Care Unit, Department of Gynaecologic Surgery, Besancon University Hospital, Besancon, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +011-33 03 81 218 118; fax: +011-33 03 81 218 610.
  • ,
  • Xavier Pivot, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Besancon University Hospital, Besancon, France
  • ,
  • Jean-Loup Sautiere, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Breast Care Unit, Department of Gynaecologic Surgery, Besancon University Hospital, Besancon, France
  • ,
  • Robert Maillet, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Breast Care Unit, Department of Gynaecologic Surgery, Besancon University Hospital, Besancon, France
  • ,
  • Didier Riethmuller, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Breast Care Unit, Department of Gynaecologic Surgery, Besancon University Hospital, Besancon, France

Received 30 January 2007; received in revised form 20 May 2007 published online 07 April 2008.

Abstract 

Background

An increasing number of patients with early-stage breast cancer is being diagnosed by way of population-wide mammographic screening in women. Because breast-conservation therapy (BCT) is the standard treatment, the aim of our study was to determine factors predisposing patients to re-excision for pT1 tumors.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted at Besancon University Hospital in France. Patients with pathologic diagnosis of invasive breast carcinoma <20 mm in size (pT1) and undergoing BCT were selected. From these, “no–re-excision” and “re-excision” subgroups were constituted and compared in terms of patient and tumor characteristics. The intent of all surgeries was therapeutic.

Results

Of 206 patients who underwent BCT for pT1 tumors, 84 (41%) needed re-excision. After multivariate analysis, factors predicting re-excision were the absence of positive histologic diagnosis before surgery (P <.0001), limited superficial and deep surgical resection (P <.0001), multifocal lesion (P <.0001), and size of the in situ carcinoma (P <.0001).

Conclusions

These predictive factors could be useful in reducing the rate of re-excision as well as in identifying patients with multifocal tumors and/or extensive in situ carcinoma whose disease would be better managed by mastectomy.

Keywords: Breast-conservation therapy, Early-stage breast cancer, Margin status, Re-excision

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(08)00088-3

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.05.052

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 195, Issue 6 , Pages 770-774, June 2008