The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 197, Issue 6 , Pages 695-701 , June 2009

The evaluation of CEEA 34 for stapled hemorrhoidectomy: results of a prospective clinical trial and patient satisfaction

  • Min-Hoe Chew, M.B.B.S., M.R.C.S. (Ed.), M.Med. (Surg.)
    • ,
  • Ming-Hian Kam, M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S. (Ed.), M.Med. (Surg.), F.A.M.S.
    • ,
  • Jit-Fong Lim, M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S. (Glasg.)
    • ,
  • Kok-Sun Ho, M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S. (Edin.), M.Med. (Surg.)
    • ,
  • Boon-Swee Ooi, M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S. (Edin.), F.R.C.S. (Glasg.), F.R.C.S. (Ireland), F.A.M.S.
    • ,
  • Choong-Leong Tang, M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S. (Edin.), M.Med. (Surg.), F.A.M.S.
    • ,
  • Kong-Weng Eu, M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S. (Edin.), M.Med. (Surg.), F.A.M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +65-63214677; fax: +65-62262009

Received 18 November 2007 ,Revised 2 January 2008

References 

  1. ASERNIP-S/National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Interventional Procedure Overview of Circular Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy. December http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/IPG342003;Accessed October 2007.
  2. Stapler Hemorrhoidopexy (Report from the Medical Procedure Assessment Division of the French Haute Autorite de Sante). http://www.has-sante.frAccessed October 2007.
  3. Ooi BS, Ho YH, Tang CL, et al. Results of stapling and conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Tech Coloproctol. 2002;6:59–60
  4. Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy-cost and effectiveness (Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months). Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1666–1675
  5. Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, et al. Stapled versus excision hemorrhoidectomy: long term follow up of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361:1437–1438
  6. Au-Young M, Rowsell M, Hemmingway DM. Randomized controlled clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a three and a half year follow up. Colorectal Dis. 2004;6:37–38
  7. Gravie JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up. Ann Surg. 2005;242:29–35
  8. Bikhchandani J, Agarwal PN, Kant R, Malik VK. Randomized controlled trial to compare the early and mid-term results of stapled versus open hemorrhoidectomy. Am J Surg. 2005;189:56–60
  9. Picchio M, Palimento D, Attanasio U, Renda A. Stapled vs open hemorrhoidectomy: long term outcome of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006;21:668–669
  10. Mattana C, Coco C, Manno A, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in the cure of fourth-degree hemorrhoids: long-term evaluation and clinical results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1770–1775
  11. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Milito G, et al. Long term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1033–1037
  12. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for hemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;355:782–785
  13. Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, et al. Stapled versus excision hemorrhoidectomy: long term follow up of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361:1437–1438
  14. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systemic review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1837–1845
  15. Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, et al. The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006;21:172–178
  16. Tjandra JJ, Chan MKY. Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:878–892
  17. Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA. Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;4:CD005393.
  18. Longo A. Treatment of haemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery In: Bologna. Italy: Monduzzi Editore; 1998;p. 777–784
  19. Guy RJ, Ng CE, Eu KW. Stapled anoplasty for haemorrhoids: a comparison of ambulatory vs. in-patient procedures. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5:29–32
  20. Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, et al. Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg. 2006;93:226–230
  21. Lim YK, Eu KW, Ho KS, et al. PPH03 stapled haemorrhoidopexy: our experience. Tech Coloproctol. 2006;10:43–46
  22. Ng KH, Chew MH, Eu KW. Modified stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a suggested improved technique. ANZ Surg. 2008;78:394–397
  23. Pigot F, Dao-Quang M, Castinel A, et al. Low haemorrhoidopexy staple line does not improve results and increases risk for incontinence. Tech Coloproctol. 2006;10:329–333
  24. Plocek MD, Kondylis LA, Duhan-Flowy N, et al. Hemorrhoidopexy staple line height predicts return to work. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1905–1909
  25. Williams R, Kondylis L, Geisler D, Kondylis P. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy height as outcome indicator. Am J Surg. 2007;193:336–339
  26. Seow-Choen F. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: pain or gain. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1–3
  27. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, et al. Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Lancet. 2000;356:730–733
  28. Mehigan BJ, Monsoon JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for hemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;355:782–785
  29. Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, et al. Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:1367–1374
  30. Guenin MO, Rosenthal R, Kern R, et al. Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: long term results and patient satisfaction after Ferguson's hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1523–1527

PII: S0002-9610(08)00493-5

doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.01.033

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 197, Issue 6 , Pages 695-701 , June 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution