The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 196, Issue 5 , Pages 623-628, November 2008

Utility and accuracy of duplex ultrasonography in evaluating in-stent restenosis after carotid stenting

Presented at the 32nd Annual Surgical Symposium of the Association of VA Surgeons, Dallas, Texas, May 4–6, 2008.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

Received 12 May 2008; received in revised form 9 July 2008

Abstract 

Background

Stents alter flow velocities after carotid artery stenting (CAS). To identify criteria for in-stent restenosis (ISR), velocities obtained by duplex ultrasonography (DU) after CAS were analyzed.

Methods

Carotid angiography and DU were performed after 129 CAS procedures. The 2 × 2 table method and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the ability of DU to detect ISR.

Results

The median follow-up period was 21.2 months (interquartile range 14–32 months). Overall, 6 patients (4.7%) had significant ISR by angiography. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the validated criteria for nonstented arteries were 100%, 85%, 25%, and 100%, respectively, to determine ISR. Newly validated criteria revealed optimal detection of ISR, with 100% sensitivity, 99% specificity, PPV of 66%, and NPV of 100%. Patients with abnormal findings on initial DU revealed increased velocities by >80% when ISR occurred.

Conclusions

DU can accurately detect ISR after CAS, but velocity criteria require modification and validation at each vascular laboratory. For patients with abnormal findings on initial DU, significant changes in velocities suggest ISR.

Keywords: Duplex ultrasonography, Carotid stenting, In-stent restenosis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(08)00561-8

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.008

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 196, Issue 5 , Pages 623-628, November 2008