The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 196, Issue 5 , Pages 647-651, November 2008

More than 150 consecutive open umbilical hernia repairs in a major Veterans Administration Medical Center

Department of Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine–Houston, Houston, TX, USA

Received 21 May 2008; received in revised form 27 July 2008

Abstract 

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of surgical site infection for open elective umbilical hernia repairs and to identify the factors related to an increased risk of infection and/or recurrence.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 152 open elective umbilical hernia repairs between 2003 and 2007 was performed.

Results

Overall, 19% of repairs became infected. Both high ASA classification (P = .01) and mesh repair (P = .01) significantly predicted wound infection, whereas age >60 years, body mass index >30, smoking, immunosuppression, diabetes, and hernia size did not. Only 2 of 17 infected mesh repairs required removal of the mesh. The recurrence rate was 1.5% for mesh and 9.2% for suture repairs.

Conclusions

Umbilical hernia repair is associated with a high rate of infection, and most superficial mesh infections can be treated with antibiotics alone. In addition, mesh repair of umbilical hernias decreased the rate of recurrence but increased the risk of infection compared with suture repairs.

Keywords: Hernia recurrence, Mesh, Surgical site infection, Umbilical hernia

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(08)00606-5

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.018

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 196, Issue 5 , Pages 647-651, November 2008