The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 196, Issue 6 , Pages 851-856, December 2008

Selective use of intraoperative sentinel lymph node pathological evaluation in breast cancer

University of Utah, Department of Surgery, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Received 2 May 2008; received in revised form 3 June 2008

Abstract 

Background

In breast cancer staging, the need for intraoperative sentinel lymph (SLN) evaluation is not well established. This study compares intraoperative use of touch preparation (TP), frozen section (FS), and factors that may influence the selective use of intraoperative SLN analysis.

Methods

Breast cancer patients (1998–2007) undergoing SLN evaluation were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Of 205 SLN procedures, 157 cases underwent intraoperative evaluation, 43% (FS) and 57% (TP) with positive pathology in 21% and 20%, respectively. The false negative case rate was 16% for TP versus 12% for FS. Of T1, low-grade tumors, 9% were intraoperatively positive, versus 43% of T2–3, moderate- to high-grade tumors (P = .006). Additional positive axillary nodes were found in 43% of the higher risk patients versus 0% in the lower risk groups.

Conclusions

Both TP and FS are accurate for intraoperative SLN evaluation and can be selectively applied to breast cancer staging in low- and high-risk groups.

Keywords: Sentinel lymph node, Intraoperative pathological analysis, Breast cancer

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(08)00639-9

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.027

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 196, Issue 6 , Pages 851-856, December 2008