The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 197, Issue 2 , Pages 159-163, February 2009

Clinical utility of breast-specific gamma imaging for evaluating disease extent in the newly diagnosed breast cancer patient

Presented at the 17th annual meeting of the Society of Black Academic Surgeons, April 17–20, 2008, Cleveland, OH.

  • Minhao Zhou, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
  • ,
  • Nathalie Johnson, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Breast Health Center, Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital, 1040 N.W. 22nd Ave., Portland, OR 97210, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-503-229-7339; fax: +1-503-229-7938
  • ,
  • Sam Gruner, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Breast Health Center, Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital, 1040 N.W. 22nd Ave., Portland, OR 97210, USA
  • ,
  • G.W. Ecklund, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Body Imaging Radiology, Beaverton, OR, USA
  • ,
  • Paul Meunier, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Body Imaging Radiology, Beaverton, OR, USA
  • ,
  • Sally Bryn, R.N.

      Affiliations

    • Breast Health Center, Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital, 1040 N.W. 22nd Ave., Portland, OR 97210, USA
  • ,
  • Margie Glissmeyer, P.A.-C.

      Affiliations

    • Breast Health Center, Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital, 1040 N.W. 22nd Ave., Portland, OR 97210, USA
  • ,
  • Kari Steinbock, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Breast Health Center, Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital, 1040 N.W. 22nd Ave., Portland, OR 97210, USA

Received 25 May 2008; received in revised form 6 October 2008

Abstract 

Background

Breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) is a functional imaging modality that has comparable sensitivity but superior specificity compared with magnetic resonance imaging, yielding fewer false-positive results and thereby improving clinical management of the newly diagnosed breast cancer patient.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed from 2 community-based breast imaging centers of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in whom BSGI was performed as part of the imaging work-up.

Results

A total of 138 patients (69 invasive ductal carcinoma, 20 invasive lobular carcinoma, 32 ductal carcinoma in situ, and 17 mixtures of invasive ductal carcinoma, invasive lobular carcinoma, or ductal carcinoma in situ and other) were reviewed. Twenty-five patients (18.1%) had a positive BSGI study at a site remote from their known cancer or more extensive disease than detected from previous imaging. Fifteen patients (10.9%) were positive for a synchronous or more extensive malignancy in the same or contralateral breast. Five patients had benign findings on pathology, 5 benign on ultrasound follow-up (false-positive rate, 7.2%). Findings converted 7 patients to mastectomy, 1 patient to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 7 patients were found to have previously undetected contralateral cancer. The positive predictive value for BSGI was 92.9%.

Conclusions

BSGI detected additional or more extensive malignancy in the same or contralateral breast in 10.9% of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Only 7.2% incurred an additional work-up. BSGI provides accurate evaluation of remaining breast tissue in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients with few false-positive readings.

Keywords: Breast-specific gamma imaging, BSGI, Preoperative breast cancer staging, Breast imaging, Magnetic resonance imaging

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(08)00749-6

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.10.002

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 197, Issue 2 , Pages 159-163, February 2009