The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 197, Issue 3 , Pages 325-330, March 2009

Male cryptoglandular fistula surgery outcomes: a retrospective analysis

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Saint Vincent Health Center, Erie, PA, USA

Received 13 July 2008; received in revised form 9 November 2008

Abstract 

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate cryptoglandular fistula surgery outcomes in men with common types of fistulae.

Method

A database review identified study patients. Exclusion criteria included history of previous fistula, previous anorectal surgery, inflammatory bowel disease, pelvic radiation, complex fistula, age <21 years, and absence of follow-up.

Results

Four hundred twenty-five patients met criteria for review. Mean follow-up was 5.8 years. Concurrent abscess at presentation was strongly associated with poorer outcomes. New-onset seepage is more common with seton treatment (P = 0.01), but seepage resolution occurred less commonly with fistulotomy (P <0.01).

Conclusions

Although both treatments are highly successful, men treated with primary fistulotomy are more likely to heal than seton patients. Fistulotomy patients have less early postoperative seepage than seton patients, but when this is present it is less likely to resolve. Presentation with concurrent abscess is strongly associated with poorer outcomes.

Keywords: Male, Fistula, Cryptoglandular, Recurrence, Incontinence, Anal, Outcomes

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(08)00775-7

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.002

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 197, Issue 3 , Pages 325-330, March 2009