The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 198, Issue 2 , Pages 193-198, August 2009

Diagnostic value of hyperbilirubinemia as a predictive factor for appendiceal perforation in acute appendicitis

  • Michael Sand, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Augusta Krankenanstalt, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Ruhr University, Bochum, Bergstr. 26, 44791, Bochum, Germany
  • ,
  • Falk G. Bechara, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
  • ,
  • Tim Holland-Letz, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
  • ,
  • Daniel Sand, B.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physiological Science, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel.: +01149-234-517-0; fax: +01149-234-517-2503
  • ,
  • Gudrun Mehnert, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Augusta Krankenanstalt, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Ruhr University, Bochum, Bergstr. 26, 44791, Bochum, Germany
  • ,
  • Benno Mann, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Augusta Krankenanstalt, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Ruhr University, Bochum, Bergstr. 26, 44791, Bochum, Germany

Received 30 July 2008; received in revised form 29 August 2008 published online 23 March 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Appendiceal perforation in patients with acute appendicitis may cause a variety of potentially life-threatening complications. Escherichia coli endotoxin has been shown to impact physiological bile flow in vivo. This had led to the theory that hyperbilirubinemia in patients with appendicitis may have a predictive potential for the preoperative diagnosis of appendiceal perforation. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the diagnostic value of hyperbilirubinemia as a preoperative laboratory marker for appendiceal perforation in patients with acute appendicitis.

Methods

We identified 538 patients (306 female; 232 male, mean age, 35.6 y) with histologically proved acute appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic or conventional appendectomy between January 2004 and December 2007 in a surgical department of an academic teaching hospital. A retrospective multiple chart review of the medical records including laboratory values and histologic results was conducted.

Results

The mean bilirubin level of all patients was .9 mg/dL (±.6 SD mg/dL; range, .1–4.3 mg/dL; median, .7 mg/dL). Patients with appendiceal perforation, however, had a mean bilirubin level of 1.5 mg/dL (±.9 SD mg/dL; range, .4–4.3 mg/dL; median, 1.4 mg/dL), which was significantly higher than those with a nonperforated appendicitis (P < .05). The specificity of hyperbilirubinemia for appendiceal perforation was .86 compared with .55 for white blood count and .35 for C-reactive protein. Sensitivity was .7 compared with .81 for white blood count and .96 for C-reactive protein.

Conclusions

Patients with hyperbilirubinemia and clinical symptoms of appendicitis should be identified as having a higher probability of appendiceal perforation than those with normal bilirubin levels.

Keywords: Appendicitis, Hyperbilirubinemia, Diagnostic

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 All authors hereby disclose any commercial associations that might pose or create a conflict of interest with information presented in this article.

PII: S0002-9610(09)00010-5

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.08.026

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 198, Issue 2 , Pages 193-198, August 2009