The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 199, Issue 2 , Pages 144-153, February 2010

Prospective clinical and functional results of combined rectal and urogynecologic surgery in complex pelvic floor disorders

  • Paolo Boccasanta, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagallie Regina Elena, IRCCS Foundation, 1st Department of General Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 39-02-29515194; fax: 39-02-55035810
  • ,
  • Marco Venturi, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagallie Regina Elena, IRCCS Foundation, 1st Department of General Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Maurizio Spennacchio, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagallie Regina Elena, IRCCS Foundation, 1st Department of General Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Arturo Buonaguidi, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagallie Regina Elena, 1st Department of Obstetric and Gynecologic Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Angelo Airoldi, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagallie Regina Elena, IRCCS Foundation, 1st Department of General Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Giancarlo Roviaro, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagallie Regina Elena, IRCCS Foundation, 1st Department of General Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Received 11 August 2008; received in revised form 5 November 2008 published online 13 April 2009.

Abstract 

Background

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the results of combined rectal and urogynecologic surgery in women with associated obstructed defecation, urinary incontinence, or genital prolapse.

Methods

One hundred forty-two selected patients with obstructed defecation in isolation or associated with urinary incontinence, enterocele, or genital prolapse were consecutively operated on by stapled transanal rectal resection alone or associated with transobturator tape, vaginal repair of the enterocele, or vaginal hysterectomy, respectively, and followed up by clinical controls and defecography.

Results

At 2 years, all symptom, quality-of-life, and defecographic parameters had significantly improved in all groups (P < .001). The association with hysterectomy showed higher risk for severe complications, longer operative time, hospital stay, and time of inability (P < .001). Recurrence of urinary incontinence was observed in 3 of 24 patients, while 2 of 21 showed residual vaginal prolapse.

Conclusion

The combination of rectal and urogynecologic surgery is effective, with higher morbidity in the association with vaginal hysterectomy. Randomized trials comparing surgery in 1 and more stages and longer follow-up are necessary for a definitive conclusion.

Keywords: Pelvic floor disorders, Obstructed defecation, Stress urinary incontinence, Enterocele, Stapled transanal rectal resection, Vaginal hysterectomy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(09)00121-4

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.040

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 199, Issue 2 , Pages 144-153, February 2010