« Previous
Next »
The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 199, Issue 1
, Pages 22-27
, January 2010
Use of a non–cross-linked porcine dermal scaffold in abdominal wall reconstruction
References
- Staged management of giant abdominal wall defects: acute and long-term results. Ann Surg. 2003;238:349–355
- Staged reconstruction after gunshot wound to the abdomen. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:83–92
- . Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg. 1985;72:70–71
- Greater risk of incisional hernia with morbidly obese than steroid-dependent patients and low recurrence with prefascial polypropylene mesh. Am J Surg. 1996;171:80–84
- Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia (A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years). Chirurg. 2002;73:474–480
- . Alloplasty of the abdominal wall after extensive cancer surgery. Am J Surg. 1971;122:781–784
- . Full thickness abdominal wall resection for recurrent and metastatic neoplasms (A report of three cases). Am Surg. 1988;54:356–360
- A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:392–398
- . Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004;240:578–583
- Role of tensor fasciae latae in abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:713–718
- Restoring abdominal wall integrity in contaminated tissue-deficient wounds using autologous fascia grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:979–986
- Risks associated with “components separation” for closure of complex abdominal wall defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1276–1283
- . Advantages of autologous fascia versus synthetic patch abdominal reconstruction in experimental animal defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97:801–806
- Comparison of prosthetic materials for abdominal wall reconstruction in the presence of contamination and infection. Ann Surg. 1985;201:705–711
- Prevention of adhesions to polypropylene mesh in a traumatized bowel model. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191:131–136
- Prevention of adhesion to prosthetic mesh: comparison of different barriers using an incisional hernia model. Ann Surg. 2003;237:123–128
- Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal-derived collagen implants in a rat model. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112:1554–1560
- . The outcome of transobturator cystocele repair using biocompatible porcine dermis graft: our experience with 32 cases. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:1647–1652
- . Porcine dermis interposition graft for repair of high grade anterior compartment defects with or without concomitant pelvic organ prolapse procedures. J Urol. 2004;171:1581–1584
- . Approaches to repair of ventral hernia and full-thickness losses of the abdominal wall. Surg Clin North Am. 1984;64:335–349
- Repair of large midline incisional hernia with polypropylene mesh: comparison of three operative techniques. Hernia. 2004;1:56–59
- . “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:519–526
- Morphologic correlation of functional abdominal wall mechanics after mesh implantation. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1997;382:87–94
- . The extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2002;13:377–383
- . InteXen tissue processing and laboratory study. Int Urogynecol J. 2006;17:S34–S38
- Adverse effects associated with the use of porcine cross-linked collagen implants in an experimental model of incisional hernia repair. J Surg Res. 2008;145:105–110
PII: S0002-9610(09)00134-2
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.12.033
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 199, Issue 1
, Pages 22-27
, January 2010
