The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 199, Issue 4 , Pages 447-452, April 2010

The ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor for patients with resectable middle and distal bile duct carcinoma

Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, School of Medicine, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama 641–8510, Japan

Received 18 December 2008; received in revised form 26 December 2008 published online 14 July 2009.

Abstract 

Background

The lymph node ratio, defined as the ratio between the number of lymph node metastasis and the total number of lymph nodes examined, has been reported to be an important prognostic factor in other gastrointestinal carcinomas except middle and distal bile duct carcinomas.

Methods

Between 1991 and 2004, 62 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for middle and distal bile duct carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed concerning prognostic factors.

Results

The median number of lymph nodes examined was 12 (range 5 to 38). The overall 5-year survival rates of patients with lymph node ratio of 0, lymph node ratio of 0 to .2, and lymph node ratio >.2 were 62%, 41%, and 0%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that a lymph node ratio >.2 and perineural invasion were independent predictive factors for survival.

Conclusions

Lymph node ratio >.2 is an important factor to predict survival after resected middle and distal bile duct carcinoma.

Keywords: Lymph node metastasis, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Overall survival

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(09)00198-6

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.019

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 199, Issue 4 , Pages 447-452, April 2010