The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 198, Issue 4 , Pages 475-481 , October 2009

Scientific Presentation Award: The impact of magnetic resonance imaging on surgical treatment of invasive breast cancer

  • Susanne G. Carpenter, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85028, USA
    • ,
  • Chee-Chee Stucky, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85028, USA
    • ,
  • Amylou C. Dueck, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
    • ,
  • Gwen Grimsby, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85028, USA
    • ,
  • Marina Giurescu, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
    • ,
  • Heidi Apsey, N.P., R.N.F.A.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85028, USA
    • ,
  • Richard J. Gray, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85028, USA
    • ,
  • Barbara A. Pockaj, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85028, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel.: +1-512-913-3778; fax: +1-480-342-2866

Received 24 March 2009 ,Revised 14 June 2009

References 

  1. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883. J Surg Oncol. 2005;92:32–38
  2. Deurloo EE, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ, et al. Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy by MRI: impact on preoperative management and potential benefit of computerised analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:1393–1401
  3. Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30:501–507
  4. Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, et al. Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1149–1157
  5. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233:830–849
  6. Hata T, Takahashi H, Watanabe K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:190–197
  7. Menell JH, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J. 2005;11:382–390
  8. Liberman L. Breast MR imaging in assessing extent of disease. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006;14:339–349, vi.
  9. Bassett LW, Dhaliwal SG, Eradat J, et al. National trends and practices in breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:332–339
  10. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–3258
  11. Tendulkar RD, Chellman-Jeffers M, Rybicki LA, et al. Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in early breast cancer: implications for partial breast irradiation. Cancer. 2009;115:1621–1630
  12. Gillanders WE, Eberlenin TJ, Margenthaler JA. The impact of breast MRI on surgical decision-making: are patients at risk for mastectomy?. March 7, 2009;Presented to the Society of Surgical Oncology, Chicago, IL
  13. Katipamula R, Hoskin TL, Boughey JC, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. (abstr) J Clin Oncol. 2009;[Epub ahead of print].
  14. Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM, et al. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg. 2007;142:441–447
  15. Morrow M, Freedman G. A clinical oncology perspective on the use of breast MR. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006;14:363–378, vi.
  16. Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1938–1943
  17. Solin LJ, Orel SG, Hwang WT, et al. Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:386–391
  18. Hillman BJ. Do we need randomized controlled clinical trials to evaluate the clinical impact of breast MR imaging?. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006;14:403–409vii–viii.

PII: S0002-9610(09)00343-2

doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.06.015

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 198, Issue 4 , Pages 475-481 , October 2009

Article Tools