Subintimal placement of covered stent versus subintimal balloon angioplasty in the treatment of long-segment superficial femoral artery occlusion

Abstract 

Background

Subintimal endovascular intervention has been used widely in the treatment of symptomatic superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusion. The relative effectiveness of subintimal placement of a covered stent (CS) versus balloon-only subintimal angioplasty (SIA) remains uncertain.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with symptomatic SFA occlusions (>15 cm) who underwent subintimal endovascular intervention, either CS or SIA, in a single institution. Primary patency was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, freedom from re-intervention, and limb salvage rates. Patency was ascertained with followup duplex or clinically.

Results

We evaluated 57 patients in the SIA group and 31 patients in the CS group. At 1 year the SFA primary patency for the SIA and CS groups was 28% versus 75% (P < .001), whereas the primary assisted patency was 37% versus 84% (P < .001), respectively. Need for bypass was 13% versus 0% (P = .05) in the SIA and CS groups, respectively.

Conclusions

Placement of a covered stent improves patency after subintimal intervention for long SFA occlusion.

Keywords: Subintimal angioplasty, Covered stent, Superficial femoral artery, Endovascular