The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 198, Issue 5, Supplement , Pages S49-S55 , November 2009

The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative: a legacy of Shukri Khuri

  • Darrell A. Campbell Jr., M.D., F.A.C.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, MI, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 734 936 5814; fax: +1 734 763 3187
  • ,
  • James J. Kubus, M.S., B.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, MI, USA
  • ,
  • Peter K. Henke, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, MI, USA
  • ,
  • Max Hutton, M.D., F.A.C.S.

      Affiliations

    • Allegiance Health Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • ,
  • Michael J. Englesbe, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, MI, USA

Received 23 June 2009 ,Revised 5 August 2009

References 

  1. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The National Veterans Administration surgical risk (Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care). J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:519–531
  2. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:315–327
  3. Khuri SF, The N. A new frontier in surgery. Surgery. 2005;138:837–843
  4. Englesbe MJ, Dimick JB, Sonnenday CJ, et al. The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative: will a statewide quality improvement initiative pay for itself?. Ann Surg. 2007;246:1100–1103
  5. Birkmeyer NJ, Share D, Campbell DA, et al. Partnering with payers to improve surgical quality: the Michigan plan. Surgery. 2005;138:815–820
  6. Campbell DA, Englesbe MJ. How can the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program help or hinder the general surgeon?. Adv Surg. 2008;42:169–181
  7. Campbell DA, Englesbe MJ, Kubus JJ, et al. Accelerating the pace of surgical quality improvement: the power of hospital collaboration. Arch Surg. 2009;[In review]
  8. Campbell DA, Henderson WG, Englesbe MJ, et al. Surgical site infection prevention: the importance of operative duration and blood transfusion—results of the First American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Best Practices Initiative. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:810–820
  9. Dimick JB, Weeks WB, Karia RJ, et al. Who pays for poor surgical quality? (Building a business case for quality improvement). J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:933–937
  10. Dimick JB, Chen SL, Taheri PA, et al. Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:531–537
  11. SCIP. Surgical Care Improvement Program—a national quality partnership. http://www.medqic.org/scip2006;

PII: S0002-9610(09)00465-6

doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.002

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 198, Issue 5, Supplement , Pages S49-S55 , November 2009