The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 198, Issue 5, Supplement , Pages S41-S48, November 2009

Outcomes of care of abdominal aortic aneurysm in Veterans Health Administration facilities: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

  • Ruth L. Bush, M.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Texas A&M Health Sciences Center, Olin E. Teague Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Temple, TX, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 254 724 9158; fax: +1 254 657 0025
  • ,
  • Ralph G. DePalma, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veteran, Affairs Central Office, Washington, DC, USA
  • ,
  • Kamal M.F. Itani, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care Systems, Boston University and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
  • ,
  • William G. Henderson, M.P.H., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
  • ,
  • Tracy S. Smith, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
  • ,
  • William P. Gunnar, M.D., J.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veteran, Affairs Central Office, Washington, DC, USA

Received 30 May 2009; received in revised form 9 August 2009

Abstract 

This report describes outcomes of care for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), along with methods used by the Veterans Affairs (VA) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) in tracking, monitoring, and improving surgical results in VA facilities. Since the inception of NSQIP in 1994, a continual drop in overall surgical mortality, along with decreased morbidity, has occurred. A parallel improvement in results of vascular surgery and AAA repair was also observed. Soon after introduction of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), with Food and Drug Administration device approval in 1999, robust electronic NSQIP records immediately began to capture individual facility performances and outcomes for both types of AAA repair. The NSQIP data center provided actual and risk-adjusted analyses for both procedures semiannually. These analyses have been used by its executive board to provide recommendations, often based on site visits, to improve outcomes. Requirements for reporting of facility-specific data and feedback, paper audits, and site visits appear to relate directly to improved AAA care. Veterans Health Administration (VHA) outcomes of AAA repair are comparable to those reported nationally and internationally and have continued to improve in recent years. National VHA initiatives, based on data feedback and active oversight, relate to some of the lowest AAA mortality rates available. This review describes past, present, and possible future NSQIP strategies to improve outcomes for AAA repair with general comments about recent alternative proposals.

Keywords: Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Endovascular aneurysm repair, EVAR, Veterans, NSQIP, Ruptured abdominal aneurysm, Quality improvement

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(09)00468-1

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.005

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 198, Issue 5, Supplement , Pages S41-S48, November 2009