« Previous
Next »
The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 199, Issue 6
, Pages 840-845
, June 2010
A tale of two trainers: virtual reality versus a video trainer for acquisition of basic laparoscopic skills
References
- Training the novice in laparoscopy (More challenge is better). Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1732–1736
- Assessment of individual hand performance in box trainers compared to virtual reality trainers. Am Surg. 2003;69:1112–1114
- Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:130–137
- Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236:458–463
- Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2004;240:518–525
- Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ. 2003;327:1032–1037
- Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg. 2004;91:146–150
- Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery. 2004;135:21–27
- Laparoscopic skills training using a webcam trainer. J Urol. 2005;173:180–183
- Metrics for objective assessment. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:220–226
- . Surgical competence and surgical proficiency: definitions, taxonomy, and metrics. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;196:933–937
- . Substituting virtual reality trainers for inanimate box trainers does not decrease laparoscopic skills acquisition. JSLS. 2007;11:87–89
- Self-reported versus observed scores in laparoscopic skills training. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:670–672
- Multicenter construct validity for southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations. J Surg Res. 2005;128:114–119
- Skill transfer from virtual reality to a real laparoscopic task. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:1076–1079
- Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:406–411
- Comparison of training on two laparoscopic simulators and assessment of skills transfer to surgical performance. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200:546–551
- Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other?. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:485–494
- A prospective randomized study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting. Ann Surg. 2005;241:442–449
- A competency-based virtual reality training curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skill. Am J Surg. 2006;191:128–133
- Discriminative validity of the minimally invasive surgical trainer in virtual reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:660–665
- Practice distribution in procedural skills training: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:957–961
- Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1383–1388
- Force feedback and basic laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2140–2148
- Impact of hand dominance, gender, and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1082–1085
- Predicting baseline laparoscopic surgery skills. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:101–104
- Nonsurgical skills do not predict baseline scores in inanimate box or virtual-reality trainers. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1686–1689
- Participants' opinions of laparoscopic training devices after a basic laparoscopic training course. Am J Surg. 2005;189:758–761
- An evaluation of the feasibility, validity, and reliability of laparoscopic skills assessment in the operating room. Ann Surg. 2007;245:992–999
PII: S0002-9610(09)00517-0
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.016
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 199, Issue 6
, Pages 840-845
, June 2010
