« Previous
Next »
The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 198, Issue 6
, Pages 771-780
, December 2009
Impact of initial surgical margins and residual cancer upon re-excision on outcome of patients with localized breast cancer
References
- Twenty-year follow-up of randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–1241
- Twenty-year follow up of a randomized study comparing breast conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–1232
- . Local therapy and survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2399–2405
- . Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:1558–1564
- Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;366:2087–2106
- Predictors of locoregional recurrence among patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:256–265
- Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–1150
- . Randomized trials of breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for primary breast cancer: a pooled analysis of updated results. Am J Clin Oncol. 2005;28:289–294
- Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Cancer. 1996;78:1921–1928
- Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1668–1675
- The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation. Cancer. 1995;76:259–267
- . Does local recurrence affect the rate of distant metastases and survival in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy?. Cancer. 2003;97:910–919
- Positive surgical margins and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence predict disease-specific survival after breast-conserving therapy. Cancer. 2003;97:926–933
- . Differences in outcome for positive margins in a large cohort of breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Acta Oncol. 2007;46:172–180
- . Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast-conserving surgery: analysis and follow-up of 543 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:464–469
- . Tumour bed positivity predicts outcome after breast-conserving surgery. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1559–1562
- . Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:979–985
- . Incidence of gross and microscopic carcinoma in specimens from patients with breast cancer after re-excision lumpectomy. Ann Surg. 1993;218:729–734
- . Relationship between initial margin status for invasive breast cancer and residual carcinoma after re-excision. Am Surg. 2007;73:337–343
- . Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1040–1044
- Lumpectomy margins, re-excision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2000;179:81–85
- . Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast conserving surgery for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1297–1303
PII: S0002-9610(09)00545-5
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.027
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 198, Issue 6
, Pages 771-780
, December 2009
