The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 200, Issue 1 , Pages 68-72, July 2010

Influence of stapler size used at ileal pouch–anal anastomosis on anastomotic leak, stricture, long-term functional outcomes, and quality of life

Presented as a podium at the American College of Surgeons 94th Annual Clinical Congress, October 12–16, 2008, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA

Received 12 March 2009; received in revised form 12 May 2009

Abstract 

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether stapler size used at ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) influences outcomes.

Methods

Data of patients undergoing stapled IPAA (1983–2007) were obtained. Differences between groups A (stapler size 28–29 mm) and B (31–33 mm) for pre- and perioperative factors, stricture, leak, quality of life (QOL), and function were compared. Associations between stapler size and stricture or leak were assessed with a multivariable Cox model.

Results

Groups A (n = 1,221) and B (n = 899) had comparable age, diagnosis, body mass index (BMI), and albumin level. Group B had more males (P < .001) but fewer patients with ileostomy (P < .001). There was no significant difference in rates of leak (4.5% vs 6.2%, P = .08) or stricture (1.9% vs 2.7%, P = .1) for groups A and B. On multivariate analysis, female gender was associated with stricture, while greater BMI and male gender were associated with leak. Group A had greater urgency at 1 year and nighttime pad use at 15 years. The other determinants of function and QOL were similar.

Conclusions

There was no significant association between the size of stapler used at IPAA and long-term complications.

Keywords: Ileal pouch–anal anastomosis, Anastomotic stricture, Anastomotic leak, Stapler size, Functional outcomes, Quality of life

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(09)00706-5

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.06.036

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 200, Issue 1 , Pages 68-72, July 2010