Follow-up disparities after trauma: a real problem for outcomes research
Abstract
Introduction
The objectives of this study were to (1) determine risk factors associated with failure to follow-up (FTF) after traumatic injury and (2) in those patients who do follow up, to determine if information within the electronic medical record (EMR) is an adequate data-collection tool for outcomes research.
Methods
A 6-year retrospective analysis was conducted on all admitted trauma patients using data from the trauma registry, National Death Index, 2000 Census Data, and the EMR. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses identified risk factors for FTF. A subgroup analysis evaluated the utility of using the EMR to determine basic functional outcomes (Glasgow outcome scale, diet, ambulation, and employment status).
Results
A total of 14,784 patients were discharged, and 61% had follow-up appointments. Lower income, higher poverty rates, and lower education were significantly (P < .05) associated with FTF. Logistic regression analysis (excluding census data) identified that older age, lower Injury Severity Score, less severe head injury, nonwhite race, blunt injury, death after discharge, zip code within 25 miles, and patients discharged to home independently predicted FTF after traumatic injury. A subgroup analysis of the EMR showed the inability to reliably determine functional outcomes.
Conclusions
There are several disparities related to follow-up after trauma. Furthermore, charting deficiencies, even with an EMR, highlight the weaknesses of data available for trauma outcomes research. Trauma process improvement programs could target patients at risk for not following up and use a structured electronic outpatient note.
Keywords: Trauma outcomes, Traumatic injury, Disparities, Outcomes research, Electronic medical record
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supported in part by grant number 1KL2RR024990 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Road map for Medical Research. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH.
PII: S0002-9610(09)00786-7
doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.09.021
© 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc.
