The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 199, Issue 5 , Pages 599-603, May 2010

Oncologic outcomes after resection of rectal cancer: Laparoscopic versus open approach

  • Chitra N. Sambasivan, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
  • ,
  • Karen E. Deveney, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
  • ,
  • Katherine T. Morris, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Legacy Health System, Cancer Research and Hepatobiliary Program NW Surgical Oncology, PC, 1040 NW 22nd Ave., Suite 540, Portland, OR 97210, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-503-413-5409; fax: +1-866-871-0349

Received 7 November 2009; received in revised form 19 January 2010

Abstract 

Background

This study examined outcomes of laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery in a community hospital setting.

Methods

A community health care system cancer registry was reviewed retrospectively (2004–2007) for rectal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment. Primary end points were rates of recurrence and survival.

Results

Both open and laparoscopic resection groups had similar demographic, treatment, and tumor characteristics. Most patients in the open resection and laparoscopic resection populations experienced no recurrence (79% vs 83%, respectively; P = .5). Overall, the groups had similar mean (88% vs 96%, respectively; P = .4) and disease-free (21 and 23 months, respectively; P = .5) survival.

Conclusions

In a community hospital setting, laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer was found to be as safe and effective as open resection in selected patients.

Keywords: Laparoscopic resection, Open resection, Rectal cancer, Outcomes, Community hospital

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(10)00040-1

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.006

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 199, Issue 5 , Pages 599-603, May 2010