The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 200, Issue 4 , Pages 529-536, October 2010

Stapler vs suture closure of pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis

  • Wei Zhou, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    • Minimally Invasive Surgery Institute of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • ,
  • Ran Lv, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel.: 86-13588706479; fax: 86-571-86044817
  • ,
  • Xianfa Wang, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    • Minimally Invasive Surgery Institute of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • ,
  • Yiping Mou, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    • Minimally Invasive Surgery Institute of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • ,
  • Xiujun Cai, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    • Minimally Invasive Surgery Institute of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • ,
  • Ingrid Herr, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Molecular OncoSurgery Group, Department of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany

Received 26 September 2009; received in revised form 22 December 2009 published online 10 June 2010.

Abstract 

Background

Suture closure and stapler closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy are the techniques used most often. The ideal choice remains a matter of debate.

Methods

Five bibliographic databases covering 1970 to July 2009 were searched.

Results

Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Stapler closure was performed in 671 patients, while suture closure was conducted in 1,615 patients. The pancreatic fistula rate ranged from 0% to 40.0% for stapler closure of the pancreatic stump and from 9.3% to 45.7% for the suture closure technique. There were no significant difference between the stapler and suture closure groups with respect to the pancreatic fistula formation rate (22.1% vs 31.2%; odds ratio, .85; 95% confidence interval, .66–1.08), although there was a trend toward favoring stapler closure. In 4 studies including 437 patients, stapler closure was associated with a trend (not statistically significant) toward a reduction in intra-abdominal abscess (odds ratio, .53; 95% confidence interval, .24–1.15).

Conclusions

No significant differences occur between suture and stapler closure with respect to the pancreatic fistula or intra-abdominal abscess after distal pancreatectomy, though there is a trend favoring stapler closure.

Keywords: Pancreatic fistula, Distal pancreatectomy, Suture, Stapler, Meta-analysis, Systematic review

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(10)00176-5

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.12.022

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 200, Issue 4 , Pages 529-536, October 2010