The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 201, Issue 1 , Pages e5-e14, January 2011

Refinement in the technique of perihepatic packing: a safe and effective surgical hemostasis and multidisciplinary approach can improve the outcome in severe liver trauma

  • Franco Baldoni, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center, Bologna, Italy
  • ,
  • Salomone Di Saverio, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center, Bologna, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39-34-8600-7338; fax: +390516478585
  • ,
  • Nicola Antonacci, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center, Bologna, Italy
  • ,
  • Carlo Coniglio, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency, Trauma ICU, Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center, Bologna, Italy
  • ,
  • Aimone Giugni, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency, Trauma ICU, Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center, Bologna, Italy
  • ,
  • Nicola Montanari, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Unit, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
  • ,
  • Andrea Biscardi, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center, Bologna, Italy
  • ,
  • Silvia Villani, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center, Bologna, Italy
  • ,
  • Giovanni Gordini, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency, Trauma ICU, Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center, Bologna, Italy
  • ,
  • Gregorio Tugnoli, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center, Bologna, Italy

Received 22 January 2010; received in revised form 24 May 2010

Abstract 

Background

Since 2005, we refined the technique of perihepatic packing including complete mobilization of the right lobe and packing around the posterior paracaval surface, lateral right side, and anterior and posteroinferior surfaces.

Methods

Two groups of patients with grade IV/V liver trauma underwent perihepatic packing before and after 2005. The study group included 12 patients treated with the new technique. The control group included 23 patients treated with the old technique.

Results

All 13 patients except one who died within 24 hours were treated with the old technique. The overall survival rate was 75% in the patients treated with the new technique (vs 30.4%, P < .02); the liver-related mortality was 8.3% versus 34.8% (P = not significant). The mean survival time in the intensive care unit was longer in the latest group (39.4 vs 22.3 days, P = not significant). The incidence of rebleeding requiring repacking was 16.7% in the patients who underwent new packing versus 45.5% in the patient who were treated with the old technique (P = not significant). The overall (81.8% vs 100%, P = not significant) and liver-related morbidity rate (18.2% vs 41.7%, P = not significant) and the incidence of abdominal sepsis (9.1% vs 41.7%, P = not significant) decreased.

Conclusions

Our refined technique of perihepatic packing seems to be safe and effective.

Keywords: Liver trauma, Perihepatic packing, Damage-control surgery, Operative technique, Trauma intensive care unit, Rebleeding, Repacking, Hemostasis, Survival, Complications, Trauma center

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(10)00622-7

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.05.015

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 201, Issue 1 , Pages e5-e14, January 2011