The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 178, Issue 1 , Pages 60-63, July 1999

Indications for and results of surgical therapy for male gynecomastia

  • Mario Colombo-Benkmann, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationRequests for reprints should be addressed to Mario Colombo-Benkmann, MD, PhD, Department of Surgery, University of Münster, Waldeyerstrasse 1, 48149 Münster, Germany
  • ,
  • Benedikt Buse, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Josef Stern, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Christian Herfarth, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Received 2 November 1998; received in revised form 19 April 1999; accepted 19 April 1999.

Abstract 

Background: The objective of our study was to analyze factors determining diagnostic versus cosmetic indication and postoperative results in the treatment of gynecomastia.

Patients and methods: Data from 100 patients and 141 breasts were analyzed retrospectively, and reevaluated by questionnaire (n = 81) and clinical examination (n = 33). Except for 2 patients, all underwent subcutaneous mastectomy through various incisions.

Results: Diagnostic surgery was exclusively performed in unilateral, nodular gynecomastia being preferentially of grade I. Higher grade, bilateral gynecomastia led mainly to cosmetic surgery. Minor complications (skin retraction, hypertrophic scars, hypesthesia, skin redundancy) occurred in 53% of patients and significantly more often in grade III or II gynecomastia. Each incision was preferentially associated with specific sequelae. However, 86% of patients were satisfied with surgical results.

Conclusions: Laterality, consistency, grade, and age at onset of symptoms determine surgical indication. Despite the high number of sequelae due to preoperative grade and selected incision, most patients are satisfied with postoperative results.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(99)00108-7

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 178, Issue 1 , Pages 60-63, July 1999