The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 178, Issue 1 , Pages 46-49, July 1999

Selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstones

Presented at the 3rd World Congress of the International Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Association, Madrid, May 24–28, 1998.

  • Roberto Bergamaschi, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Visceral Surgery and Gastroenterology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationRequests for reprints should be addressed to R. Bergamaschi, MD, PhD, National Center for Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery, University Hospital, Olav Kyrres gate 17, N-7006 Trondheim, Norway
  • ,
  • Jean Jacques Tuech, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Visceral Surgery and Gastroenterology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
  • ,
  • Laurence Braconier, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Visceral Surgery and Gastroenterology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
  • ,
  • Ronald Mårvik, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Visceral Surgery and Gastroenterology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
  • ,
  • Jean Boyet, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Visceral Surgery and Gastroenterology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
  • ,
  • Jean-Pierre Arnaud, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Visceral Surgery and Gastroenterology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France

Received 1 December 1998; received in revised form 19 April 1999; accepted 19 April 1999.

Abstract 

Background: To assess the outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for symptomatic gallbladder and suspected duct stones.

Methods: During 3 years, one or more of four criteria led to ERC: jaundice, choledocus >8 mm, cholestasis, and severe biliary pancreatitis. Endoscopic extraction (ESE) of ductal stones was attempted before LC.

Results: In all, 990 patients were prospectively included. There were no exclusions. There were no deaths. A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified jaundice (P = 0.001), pancreatitis (P = 0.001), and cholestasis (P = 0.001) as statistically significant predictors of ductal stones. Choledocus >8 mm was not a significant predictor (P = 0.12). A total of 155 (16%) patients underwent ERC for suspected stones: 21 of 155 (13%) patients had no stones; and 6 of 134 (4%) patients had stone impaction cleared at open surgery. ERC clearance rate was 95% (128 of 134). LC was performed in 149 of 155 patients after a median interval of 3 days (range 1 to 7). Morbidity rates were 3% (4 of 134), 2% (3 of 149), and nil (0 of 6) after ESE, LC, or open surgery, respectively. Median hospital stay was 11 days. A total of 835 patients underwent LC with a 1.5% complication rate. Laparoscopic fluoro-cholangiography showed ≤3 mm-sized stones in 10 of 835 (1.2%) patients. No stones were reported at a median follow-up of 4 months including 990 patients.

Conclusions: Ninety-five percent of patients with ductal stones can be successfully and safely managed by ERC prior to LC.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9610(99)00110-5

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 178, Issue 1 , Pages 46-49, July 1999