The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 170, Issue 2 , Pages 91-96, August 1995

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: The financial analysis

Section of Vascular Surgery, Gelsinger Cilnic, Danville, Pennsylvania USA

Abstract 

Background: Denlai of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) repair has been advocated based upon historically poor surgical outcome and a percelved lack of cost effectiveness. Although the repair intuitively seems expensive, the actual cost of care, adequacy of reimburssment, and cost per additional life-year gained for RAAA repair are poorly defined.

Patients and methods: Retrospective clinical and financial chart review of 119 consecutive patients undergoing operation for RAAA from 1986 to 1993.

Results: Overall in-hospital mortallty was 45%. Mean institutional charge per patient in 1993 dollars was $40,763 (range $4,473 to $284,374), with an actual mean cost for service of $22,420 and an average reimbursement of $21,360, resulting in a loss of $1,060 per patients. Losses were higher in Medicare patients. Survivors (n = 65) had an average length of stay of 20 days, cost $41,045 each, and incurred an institutional loss of $298,405. Mean cost per additional (adjusted) life-year was $3,953. One-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates following hospital discharge were 97%, 85%, and 77%, respactively.

Conclusions: Emergency repair of RAAA is relatively inexpensive when compared to other commonly used health maintenence protocois and effectively restores survivors to their former health. Since no cilnical or physiologic parameter can predict poor outcome, operative intervention should not be denled.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This paper was the winner of the Peter B. Samuels Award, Vascular Surgery Fellow Essay Competition.Presented at the 23rd Annual Meeting of The Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery, Fort Laudarcale, Florida, March 22–26, 1996.

PII: S0002-9610(99)80262-1

The American Journal of Surgery
Volume 170, Issue 2 , Pages 91-96, August 1995