Umbilical hernia repair with mesh: identifying effectors of ideal outcomes



      Quality of life has become an important focus for improvement in hernia repair.


      The International Hernia Mesh Registry was queried. The Carolinas Comfort Scale quantitated quality of life at 1-month, 6-month, and annual follow-up. Scores of 0 (completely asymptomatic) in all categories without recurrence defined an ideal outcome.


      The analysis consisted of 363 umbilical hernia repairs; 18.7% were laparoscopic. Demographics included age of 51.5 ± 13.8 years, 24.5% were female, and the average body mass index was 30.63 ± 5.9 kg/m2. Mean defect size was 4.3 ± 3.1 cm2. Mean follow-up was 18.2 months. Absent/minimal preoperative symptoms were predictive of ideal outcome at all time points and increasing age was predictive at 6 months and 1 year. At 6 months, the use of fixation sutures alone versus tacks (odds ratio 14.1) predicted ideal outcome.


      Ideal outcomes are dependent on both patient-specific and operative factors. The durable, ideal outcome in umbilical hernia repair is most likely in an older, asymptomatic patient who undergoes mesh fixation with permanent suture.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Muschaweck U.
        Umbilical and epigastric hernia repair.
        Surg Clin North Am. 2003; 83: 1207-1221
        • Luijendijk R.W.
        • Lemmen M.H.
        • Hop W.C.
        • et al.
        Incisional hernia recurrence following “vest-over-pants” or vertical Mayo repair of primary hernias of the midline.
        World J Surg. 1997; 21 (discussion, 66): 62-65
        • Mislowsky A.
        • Hemphill A.
        • Nasrallah D.V.
        A scarless technique of umbilical hernia repair in the adult population.
        Hernia. 2008; 12: 627-630
        • Mayo W.J.
        VI. An operation for the radical cure of umbilical hernia.
        Ann Surg. 1901; 34: 276-280
        • Aslani N.
        • Brown C.J.
        Does mesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Hernia. 2010; 14: 455-462
        • Moore T.C.
        • Siderys H.
        The use of pliable plastics in the repair of abdominal wall defects.
        Ann Surg. 1955; 142: 973-979
        • Arroyo A.
        • Garcia P.
        • Perez F.
        • et al.
        Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults.
        Br J Surg. 2001; 88: 1321-1323
      1. Tsirline VB, Lincourt AE, Belyansky I, et al. The Carolinas Comfort Score is a Reliable and Sensitive Measure of Patient Quality of Life after Mesh Hernia Repair with up to 4 Years of Follow-up. Paper Presented at: American Hernia Society2011; San Francisco, CA.

        • Heniford B.T.
        • Walters A.L.
        • Lincourt A.E.
        • et al.
        Comparison of generic versus specific quality-of-life scales for mesh hernia repairs.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 206: 638-644
        • Berrevoet F.
        • D'Hont F.
        • Rogiers X.
        • et al.
        Open intraperitoneal versus retromuscular mesh repair for umbilical hernias less than 3 cm diameter.
        Am J Surg. 2011; 201: 85-90
        • Tollens T.
        • Den Hondt M.
        • Devroe K.
        • et al.
        Retrospective analysis of umbilical, epigastric, and small incisional hernia repair using the Ventralex hernia patch.
        Hernia. 2011; 15: 531-540
        • Colavita P.D.
        • Tsirline V.B.
        • Belyansky I.
        • et al.
        Prospective, long-term comparison of quality of life in laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair.
        Ann Surg. 2012; 256 (discussion, 722–13): 714-722
        • Wormer B.A.
        • Walters A.L.
        • Bradley 3rd, J.F.
        • et al.
        Does ventral hernia defect length, width, or area predict postoperative quality of life? Answers from a prospective, international study.
        J Surg Res. 2013; 184: 169-177
        • Eriksen J.R.
        • Poornoroozy P.
        • Jorgensen L.N.
        • et al.
        Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
        Hernia. 2009; 13: 13-21
        • Heniford B.T.
        • Park A.
        • Ramshaw B.J.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years' experience with 850 consecutive hernias.
        Ann Surg. 2003; 238 (discussion, 399–400): 391-399
        • Carbonell A.M.
        • Harold K.L.
        • Mahmutovic A.J.
        • et al.
        Local injection for the treatment of suture site pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
        Am Surg. 2003; 69 (discussion, 691–2): 688-691
        • Nguyen S.Q.
        • Divino C.M.
        • Buch K.E.
        • et al.
        Postoperative pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective comparison of sutures versus tacks.
        JSLS. 2008; 12: 113-116
        • Wassenaar E.
        • Schoenmaeckers E.
        • Raymakers J.
        • et al.
        Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques.
        Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 1296-1302
        • Belyansky I.
        • Tsirline V.B.
        • Klima D.A.
        • et al.
        Prospective, comparative study of postoperative quality of life in TEP, TAPP, and modified Lichtenstein repairs.
        Ann Surg. 2011; 254 (discussion, 714–5): 709-714
        • Emerson G.B.
        • Warme W.J.
        • Wolf F.M.
        • et al.
        Testing for the presence of positive-outcome bias in peer review: a randomized controlled trial.
        Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170: 1934-1939
        • Urbach D.R.
        Measuring quality of life after surgery.
        Surg Innov. 2005; 12: 161-165
        • Velanovich V.
        Comparison of generic (SF-36) vs. disease-specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of-life scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 1998; 2: 141-145
        • Klosterhalfen B.
        • Junge K.
        • Klinge U.
        The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair.
        Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005; 2: 103-117
        • Champault G.
        • Bernard C.
        • Rizk N.
        • et al.
        Inguinal hernia repair: the choice of prosthesis outweighs that of technique.
        Hernia. 2007; 11: 125-128
        • Cobb W.S.
        • Kercher K.W.
        • Heniford B.T.
        The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair.
        Surg Innov. 2005; 12: 63-69
        • Bringman S.
        • Wollert S.
        • Osterberg J.
        • et al.
        Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia.
        Br J Surg. 2006; 93: 1056-1059
        • Bringman S.
        • Wollert S.
        • Osterberg J.
        • et al.
        Early results of a randomized multicenter trial comparing Prolene and VyproII mesh in bilateral endoscopic extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP).
        Surg Endosc. 2005; 19: 536-540
        • Heikkinen T.
        • Wollert S.
        • Osterberg J.
        • et al.
        Early results of a randomised trial comparing Prolene and VyproII mesh in endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) of recurrent unilateral hernias.
        Hernia. 2006; 10: 34-40
        • Post S.
        • Weiss B.
        • Willer M.
        • et al.
        Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.
        Br J Surg. 2004; 91: 44-48
        • O'Dwyer P.J.
        • Kingsnorth A.N.
        • Molloy R.G.
        • et al.
        Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair.
        Br J Surg. 2005; 92: 166-170
        • Ladurner R.
        • Chiapponi C.
        • Linhuber Q.
        • et al.
        Long term outcome and quality of life after open incisional hernia repair—light versus heavy weight meshes.
        BMC Surg. 2011; 11: 25
        • Colavita P.D.
        • Tsirline V.B.
        • Belyansky I.
        • et al.
        Prospective, long-term comparison of quality of life in laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair.
        Ann Surg. 2012; 256: 714-722
        • Itani K.M.
        • Neumayer L.
        • Reda D.
        • et al.
        Repair of ventral incisional hernia: the design of a randomized trial to compare open and laparoscopic surgical techniques.
        Am J Surg. 2004; 188: 22S-29S
        • Pell J.P.
        Impact of intermittent claudication on quality of life. The Scottish Vascular Audit Group.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1995; 9: 469-472
        • Black N.
        • Petticrew M.
        • Ginzler M.
        • et al.
        Do doctors and patients agree? Views of the outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate.
        Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1991; 7: 533-544
        • Zaborszky A.
        • Gyanti R.
        • Barry J.A.
        • et al.
        Measurement issues when assessing quality of life outcomes for different types of hernia mesh repair.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011; 93: 281-285