Research priorities for multi-institutional collaborative research in surgical education

Published:October 21, 2014DOI:



      Research in surgical education has seen unprecedented growth but originates from single institutions and remains uncoordinated; this study aimed to generate a list of research priorities in surgical educational topics.


      The membership of the Association for Surgical Education was asked to submit up to 5 research questions concerned with multi-institutional collaborative surgical education research and to identify challenges faced by surgical education researchers. A modified Delphi methodology was used to create the research agenda based on these responses.


      Surgical educators responded to 3 survey rounds. Categories of submitted questions included teaching methods and curriculum development; assessment and competency; simulation; medical student preparation and selection; impact of work hour restrictions; and faculty development. Participants cited institutional culture and practice variability and lack of institutional review board coordination as common barriers to collaborative research, while identifying extensive planning, frequent communication, and availability of dedicated research coordinators as the most important facilitators.


      Using a Delphi methodology, a prioritized agenda for multi-institutional surgical education research was developed that may help advance surgeon education.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Reznick R.K.
        • MacRae H.
        Teaching surgical skills—changes in the wind.
        N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 2664-2669
        • Derossis A.M.
        • DaRosa D.A.
        • Dutta S.
        • et al.
        A ten-year analysis of surgical education research.
        Am J Surg. 2000; 180: 58-61
        • Baernstein A.
        • Liss H.K.
        • Carney P.A.
        • et al.
        Trends in study methods used in undergraduate medical education research, 1969-2007.
        JAMA. 2007; 298: 1038-1045
        • Carline J.D.
        Funding medical education research: opportunities and issues.
        Acad Med. 2004; 79: 918-924
        • Reed D.A.
        • Kern D.E.
        • Levine R.B.
        • et al.
        Costs and funding for published medical education research.
        JAMA. 2005; 294: 1052-1057
        • Stefanidis D.
        • Arora S.
        • Parrack D.M.
        • et al.
        Research priorities in surgical simulation for the 21st century.
        Am J Surg. 2012; 203: 49-53
        • Aggarwal R.
        Surgical education research: an IDEAL Proposition.
        Ann Surg. 2014; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Urbach D.R.
        • Horvath K.D.
        • Baxter N.N.
        • et al.
        A research agenda for gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery.
        Surg Endosc. 2007; 21: 1518-1525
      1. Dalkey NC. The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion. 1969.

        • Fink A.
        • Kosecoff J.
        • Chassin M.
        • et al.
        Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use.
        Am J Public Health. 1984; 74: 979-983
        • Adler M.
        • Ziglio E.
        Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and its Application to Social Policy and Public Health.
        Jessica Kingsley, London1996
        • Park R.E.
        • Fink A.
        • Brook R.H.
        • et al.
        Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures.
        Am J Public Health. 1986; 76: 766-772
        • Seematter-Bagnoud L.
        • Vader J.P.
        • Wietlisbach V.
        • et al.
        Overuse and underuse of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in various clinical settings.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 1999; 11: 301-308
        • Daar A.S.
        • Thorsteinsdottir H.
        • Martin D.K.
        • et al.
        Top ten biotechnologies for improving health in developing countries.
        Nat Genet. 2002; 32: 229-232
        • Nathens A.B.
        • Rivara F.P.
        • Jurkovich G.J.
        • et al.
        Management of the injured patient: identification of research topics for systematic review using the delphi technique.
        J Trauma. 2003; 54: 595-601