Advertisement

Effects of disruptive surgeon behavior in the operating room

Published:October 21, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.09.017

      Abstract

      Background

      Surgeons are the physician group most commonly identified as “disruptive physicians.” The aim of this study was to develop a conceptual model of the results of disruptive surgeon behavior and to identify the coping strategies used by perioperative staff.

      Methods

      Perspectives of 19 individuals of diverse occupations in the perioperative setting were drawn together using a grounded theory methodology.

      Results

      Effects of disruptive behavior described by participants included shift in attention from the patient to the surgeon, increased mistakes during procedures, deterrence from careers in surgery, and diminished respect for surgeons. Individual coping strategies employed in the face of intimidation include talking to colleagues, externalizing the behavior, avoidance of perpetrators, and warning others.

      Conclusions

      Using grounded theory analysis, we were able to elucidate the impact of disruptive surgeon behavior in the perioperative environment. This conceptual model may be used to understand and counter the negative effects of manipulation and intimidation of hospital staff and trainees and to build on current programmatic strengths to improve surgical environments and training.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rosenstein A.H.
        • O’Daniel M.
        Impact and implications of disruptive behavior in the perioperative arena.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 203: 96-105
        • Rosenstein A.H.
        Original research: nurse-physician relationships: impact on nurse satisfaction and retention.
        Am J Nurs. 2002; 102: 26-34
        • Rosenstein A.H.
        • O’Daniel M.
        Invited article: managing disruptive physician behavior: impact on staff relationships and patient care.
        Neurology. 2008; 70: 1564-1570
      1. The Joint Commission. Sentinel Event Alert, Issue 40: Behaviors that Undermine a Culture of Safety; 2010. Available at: http://www.jointcommission.org/sentinel_event_alert_issue_40_behaviors_that_undermine_a_culture_of_safety/. Accessed May 5, 2014.

        • Rosenstein A.H.
        • O'Daniel M.
        Disruptive behavior and clinical outcomes: perceptions of nurses and physicians.
        Am J Nurs. 2005; 105 (quiz 64–5): 54-64
        • Rosenstein A.H.
        • O’Daniel M.
        A survey of the impact of disruptive behaviors and communication defects on patient safety.
        Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008; 34: 464-471
        • Glaser B.G.
        • Strauss A.L.
        The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
        Aldine, New York1967
        • Strauss A.L.
        Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists.
        Cambridge University Press, Cambridge1987
        • Strauss A.L.
        • Corbin J.
        Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
        3rd ed. Sage Publications, Inc., Los Angeles, CA2008
        • Patton M.Q.
        Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.
        3rd ed. Sage Publications, Inc., Los Angeles, CA2001
        • Lincoln Y.S.
        • Guba E.G.
        Naturalistic Inquiry.
        Sage Publications, Inc., Los Angeles, CA1985
        • Williams E.
        • Morrow S.
        Achieving trustworthiness in qualitative research: a pan-paradigmatic perspective.
        Psychother Res. 2009; 19: 576-582
        • Morrow S.
        • Smith M.
        Qualitative research for counseling psychology.
        in: Brown S. Lent R. Handbook of Counseling Psychology. 3rd ed. Wiley, New York2000: 199-230
        • Charmaz K.
        Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis.
        Sage, London2006
        • Ponterotto J.
        Qualitative research in counseling psychology: a primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science.
        J Couns Psychol. 2005; 52: 126-136
        • Morrow S.
        Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology.
        J Couns Psychol. 2005; 52: 250-260
        • Lingard L.
        • Espin S.
        • Whyte S.
        • et al.
        Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; 13: 330-334
        • Porto G.
        • Lauve R.
        Disruptive clinician behavior: a persistent threat to patient safety.
        Patient Saf Qual Healthc. 2006; (Available at:) (Accessed May 5, 2014)
        • Lingard L.
        • Reznick R.
        • Espin S.
        • et al.
        Team communications in the operating room: talk patterns, sites of tension, and implications for novices.
        Acad Med. 2002; 77: 232-237
        • Cochran A.
        • Paukert J.L.
        • Neumayer L.A.
        Does a general surgery clerkship influence student perceptions of surgeons and surgical careers?.
        Surgery. 2003; 134: 153-157
        • Berman L.
        • Rosenthal M.S.
        • Curry L.A.
        • et al.
        Attracting surgical clerks to surgical careers: role models, mentoring, and engagement in the operating room.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207 (800.e1-2): 793-800
        • Brainard A.H.
        • Brislen H.C.
        Viewpoint: learning professionalism: a view from the trenches.
        Acad Med. 2007; 82: 1010-1014
        • Byszewski A.
        • Hendelman W.
        • McGuinty C.
        • et al.
        Wanted: role models—medical students’ perceptions of professionalism.
        BMC Med Educ. 2012; 12: 115
        • Feudtner C.
        • Christakis D.A.
        • Christakis N.A.
        Do clinical clerks suffer ethical erosion? Students’ perceptions of their ethical environment and personal development.
        Acad Med. 1994; 69: 670-679
        • Nagler A.
        • Andolsek K.
        • Rudd M.
        • et al.
        The professionalism disconnect: do entering residents identify yet participate in unprofessional behaviors?.
        BMC Med Educ. 2014; 14: 60
        • Ginsburg S.
        • Regehr G.
        • Stern D.
        • et al.
        The anatomy of the professional lapse: bridging the gap between traditional frameworks and students’ perceptions.
        Acad Med. 2002; 77: 516-522
        • Beach M.C.
        • Duggan P.S.
        • Cassel C.K.
        • et al.
        What does “respect” mean? Exploring the moral obligation of health professionals to respect patients.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22: 692-695
        • Leape L.L.
        • Shore M.F.
        • Dienstag J.L.
        • et al.
        Perspective: a culture of respect, part 2: creating a culture of respect.
        Acad Med. 2012; 87: 853-858
        • Hickson G.B.
        Patient complaints and malpractice risk.
        JAMA. 2002; 287: 2951
        • Hickson G.B.
        • Pichert J.W.
        • Webb L.E.
        • et al.
        A complementary approach to promoting professionalism: identifying, measuring, and addressing unprofessional behaviors.
        Acad Med. 2007; 82: 1040-1048
        • Swiggart W.H.
        • Dewey C.M.
        • Hickson G.B.
        • et al.
        A plan for identification, treatment, and remediation of disruptive behaviors in physicians.
        Front Health Serv Manage. 2009; 25: 3-11
        • Rogers D.
        • Lingard L.
        • Boehler M.L.
        • et al.
        Teaching operating room conflict management to surgeons: clarifying the optimal approach.
        Med Educ. 2011; 45: 939-945
        • Rogers D.A.
        • Lingard L.
        • Boehler M.L.
        • et al.
        Surgeons managing conflict in the operating room: defining the educational need and identifying effective behaviors.
        Am J Surg. 2013; 205: 125-130
        • Lingard L.
        • Regehr G.
        • Espin S.
        • et al.
        Perceptions of operating room tension across professions: building generalizable evidence and educational resources.
        Acad Med. 2005; 80: S75-S79
        • Makary M.A.
        • Sexton J.B.
        • Freischlag J.A.
        • et al.
        Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 202: 746-752
        • Awad S.S.
        • Fagan S.P.
        • Bellows C.
        • et al.
        Bridging the communication gap in the operating room with medical team training.
        Am J Surg. 2005; 190: 770-774
        • Armour Forse R.
        • Bramble J.D.
        • McQuillan R.
        Team training can improve operating room performance.
        Surgery. 2011; 150: 771-778
        • Paige J.T.
        • Garbee D.D.
        • Kozmenko V.
        • et al.
        Getting a head start: high-fidelity, simulation-based operating room team training of interprofessional students.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 218: 140-149
      2. ANTS: A Behavioural Marker System for Rating Anaesthetists’ Non-Technical Skills. Available at: http://www.abdn.ac.uk/iprc/ants/. Accessed April 15, 2014.

      3. NOTSS: Non-technical skills for Surgeons. Available at: http://www.abdn.ac.uk/iprc/notss/. Accessed April 15, 2014.

      4. SPLINTS: Scrub Practitioners’ List of Intraoperative Non-Technical Skills. Available at: http://www.abdn.ac.uk/iprc/splints/. Accessed April 15, 2014.

        • Rogers D.A.
        • Lingard L.
        • Boehler M.L.
        • et al.
        Foundations for teaching surgeons to address the contributions of systems to operating room team conflict.
        Am J Surg. 2013; 206: 428-432
        • Piper L.E.
        Addressing the phenomenon of disruptive physician behavior.
        Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2003; 22: 335-339
        • Eberlein T.J.
        Shaping a modern academic department of surgery: honoring the past; focusing on the future.
        Ann Surg. 2012; 256: 395-401