Advertisement

A pilot study examining experiential learning vs didactic education of abdominal compartment syndrome

      Abstract

      Background

      Current surgical education relies on simulated educational experiences or didactic sessions to teach low-frequency clinical events such as abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate if simulation would improve performance and knowledge retention of ACS better than a didactic lecture.

      Methods

      Nineteen general surgery residents were block randomized by postgraduate year level to a didactic or a simulation session. After 3 months, all residents completed a knowledge assessment before participating in an additional simulation. Two independent reviewers assessed resident performance via audio-video recordings.

      Results

      No baseline differences in ACS experience were noted between groups. The observational evaluation demonstrated a significant difference in performance between the didactic and simulation groups: 9.9 vs 12.5, P = .037 (effect size = 1.15). Knowledge retention was equivalent between groups.

      Conclusions

      This pilot study suggests that simulation-based education may be more effective for teaching the basic concepts of ACS.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Issenberg S.B.
        • McGaghie W.C.
        • Petrusa E.R.
        • et al.
        Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review.
        Med Teach. 2005; 27: 10-28
        • Okuda Y.
        • Bryson E.O.
        • DeMaria S.
        • et al.
        The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence?.
        Mt Sinai J Med. 2009; 76: 330-343
        • Nestel D.
        • Groom J.
        • Eikeland-Husebo S.
        • et al.
        Simulation for learning and teaching procedural skills: the state of the science.
        Simul Healthc. 2011; : S10-S13
        • Krajewski A.
        • Filippa D.
        • Staff I.
        • et al.
        Implementation of an intern boot camp curriculum to address clinical competencies under the new accreditation council for graduate medical education supervision requirements and duty hour restrictions.
        JAMA Surg. 2013; 148: 727-732
        • Gardner A.K.
        • Scott D.J.
        • Hebert J.C.
        • et al.
        Gearing up for milestones in surgery: will simulation play a role?.
        Surgery. 2015; 158: 1421-1427
        • Singh P.
        • Aggarwal R.
        • Pucher P.H.
        • et al.
        An immersive “simulation week” enhances clinical performance of incoming surgical interns improved performance persists at 6 months follow-up.
        Surgery. 2015; 157: 432-443
        • Daniels K.
        • Arafeh J.
        • Clark A.
        • et al.
        Prospective randomized trial of simulation versus didactic teaching for obstetrical emergencies.
        Simul Healthc. 2010; 5: 40-45
        • Stayt L.C.
        • Merriman C.
        • Ricketts B.
        • et al.
        Recognizing and managing a deteriorating patient: a randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of clinical simulation in improving clinical performance in undergraduate nursing students.
        J Adv Nurs. 2015; 71: 2563-2574
        • Wang C.L.
        • Schopp J.G.
        • Petscavage J.M.
        • et al.
        Prospective randomized comparison of standard didactic lecture versus high-fidelity simulation for radiology resident contrast reaction management training.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196: 1288-1295
        • Starkopf J.
        • Tamme K.
        • Blaser A.R.
        Should we measure intra-abdominal pressures in every intensive care patient?.
        Ann Intensive Care. 2012; : S9
        • Kirkpatrick A.W.
        • Roberts D.J.
        • De Waele J.
        • et al.
        Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the world society of the abdominal compartment syndrome.
        Intensive Care Med. 2013; 39: 1190-1206
        • De Keulenaer B.L.
        • De Waele J.J.
        • Powell B.
        • et al.
        What is normal intra-abdominal pressure and how is it affected by positioning, body mass and positive end-expiratory pressure?.
        Intensive Care Med. 2009; 35: 969-976
        • Katsios C.
        • Ye C.
        • Hoad N.
        • et al.
        Intra-abdominal hypertension in the critically ill: interrater reliability of bladder pressure measurement.
        J Crit Care. 2013; 28: 886.e1-886.e6
        • Kimball E.J.
        • Mone M.C.
        • Wolfe T.R.
        • et al.
        Reproducibility of bladder pressure measurements in critically ill patients.
        Intensive Care Med. 2007; 33: 1195-1198
        • De Keulenaer B.L.
        • Regli A.
        • Malbrain M.L.
        Intra-abdominal measurement techniques: is there anything new?.
        Am Surg. 2011; : S17-S22
        • Yi M.
        • Leng Y.
        • Bai Y.
        • et al.
        The evaluation of the effect of body positioning on intra-abdominal pressure measurement and the effect of intra-abdominal pressure at different body positioning on organ function and prognosis in critically ill patients.
        J Crit Care. 2012; 27: 222.e1-222.e6
        • Barsuk J.H.
        • McGaghie W.C.
        • Cohen E.R.
        • et al.
        Use of simulation-based mastery learning to improve the quality of central venous catheter placement in a medical intensive care unit.
        J Hosp Med. 2009; 4: 397-403
        • Johnston M.J.
        • Paige J.T.
        • Aggarwal R.
        • et al.
        An overview of research priorities in surgical simulation: what the literature shows has been achieved during the 21st century and what remains.
        Am J Surg. 2016; 211: 214-225
        • Riley W.
        • Davis S.
        • Miller K.
        • et al.
        Didactic and simulation nontechnical skills team training to improve perinatal patient outcomes in a community hospital.
        Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011; 37: 357-364
        • Gjeraa K.
        • Moller T.P.
        • Ostergaard D.
        Efficacy of simulation-based trauma team training of non-technical skills. A systematic review.
        Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014; 58: 775-787
        • Krage R.
        • Tjon Soei Len L.
        • Schober P.
        • et al.
        Does individual experience affect performance during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with additional external distractors?.
        Anaesthesia. 2014; 69: 983-989
        • Briggs A.
        • Raja A.S.
        • Joyce M.F.
        • et al.
        The role of nontechnical skills in simulated trauma resuscitation.
        J Surg Educ. 2015; 72: 732-739
        • Buckley C.E.
        • Kavanagh D.O.
        • Traynor O.
        • et al.
        Is the skillset obtained in surgical simulation transferable to the operating theatre?.
        Am J Surg. 2014; 207: 146-157