Advertisement

Impact of integrated programs on general surgery operative volume

Published:December 27, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.10.029

      Abstract

      Background

      Integrated residencies are now commonplace, co-existing with categorical general surgery residencies. The purpose of this study was to define the impact of integrated programs on categorical general surgery operative volume.

      Methods

      Case logs from categorical general, integrated plastics, vascular, and thoracic surgery residents from a single institution from 2008 to 2016 were collected and analyzed.

      Results

      Integrated residents have increased the number of cases they perform that would have previously been general surgery resident cases from 11 in 2009–2010 to 1392 in 2015–2016. Despite this, there was no detrimental effect on total major cases of graduating chief residents.

      Conclusions

      Multiple integrated programs can co-exist with a general surgery program through careful collaboration and thoughtful consideration to longitudinal needs of individual trainees. As additional programs continue to be created, both integrated and categorical program directors must continue to collaborate to insure the integrity of training for all residents.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Coleman J.J.
        • Esposito T.J.
        • Rozycki G.S.
        • Feliciano D.V.
        Early subspecialization and perceived competence in surgical training: are residents ready?.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 216 (discussion 771-3): 764-771
        • Hardacre J.M.
        • Chen H.
        • Martin C.
        • Lillemoe K.D.
        General surgery and fellowship training: opinions of surgical intern applicants and fellowship directors.
        Surgery. 2000; 127: 14-18
        • Lindeman B.M.
        • Sacks B.C.
        • Hirose K.
        • Lipsett P.A.
        Multifaceted longitudinal study of surgical resident education, quality of life, and patient care before and after July 2011.
        J Surg Educ. 2013; 70: 769-776
        • Grover B.T.
        • Kothari S.N.
        Fellowship training: need and contributions.
        Surg Clin North Am. 2016; 96: 47-57
        • Lynge D.C.
        • Larson E.H.
        • Thompson M.J.
        • et al.
        A longitudinal analysis of the general surgery workforce in the United States, 1981-2005.
        Arch Surg. 2008; 143 (discussion 351): 345-350
        • Cadish L.A.
        • Fung V.
        • Lane F.L.
        • Campbell E.G.
        Surgical case logging habits and attitudes: a multispecialty survey of residents.
        J Surg Educ. 2016; 73: 474-481
        • Nygaard R.M.
        • Daly S.R.
        • Van Camp J.M.
        General surgery resident case logs: do they accurately reflect resident experience?.
        J Surg Educ. 2015; 72 (e178–83)