Advertisement
Original Research Article| Volume 223, ISSUE 5, P957-962, May 2022

Presentation, treatment, and prognosis of colorectal adenosquamous carcinoma: A contemporary analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database

Published:September 10, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.09.004

      Highlights

      • Colorectal adenosquamous carcinoma is very rare among colorectal cancers with paucity of data regarding its natural history and prognosis.
      • Patients with ASC are more likely to present with more advanced stages and distant metastases compared to patients with Adenocarcinoma and Squamous cell carcinoma.
      • In the colon, major surgery was the mainstay of treatment for ASC, while in the rectum surgery chemotherapy and/or radiation were utilized in different combinations.
      • On multivariable analysis, Adenosquamous cancer was associated with poor prognosis compared to Adenocarcinoma.

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Colorectal adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) represents <0.1% of colorectal cancers. Due to its rarity, there is paucity of data regarding its prognosis and treatment compared to other colorectal cancers. The aim of the study was to evaluate presentation, treatment and prognosis of colorectal ASC in comparison to adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

      Methods

      Adult patients diagnosed with colorectal AC, SCC, and ASC between 2000 and 2017 were identified using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

      Results

      Among the 446,132 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer, 0.06% had ASC and were more likely to present with higher T stage and distant metastases compared to AC and SCC (p < 0.001). Major surgery was the primary treatment for colonic ASC, while for rectal ASC, chemotherapy and/or radiation were mainly utilized. Localized and distant colonic ASC had an unadjusted 5-year cause-specific survival that was worse than AC, while rectal ASC had the worst survival across all stages.

      Conclusion

      Colorectal ASC usually present with advanced stage and have overall worse prognosis. Standardization of treatment strategies may improve survival in colorectal ASC.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Cagir B.
        • et al.
        Adenosquamous carcinoma of the colon, rectum, and anus: epidemiology, distribution, and survival characteristics.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1999; 42: 258-263https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237138
        • Masoomi H.
        • et al.
        Population-based evaluation of adenosquamous carcinoma of the colon and rectum.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2012; 55: 509-514https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182420953
        • Petrelli N.J.
        • et al.
        Adenosquamous carcinoma of the colon and rectum.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39: 1265-1268https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055120
        • Sunkara T.
        • et al.
        Adenosquamous carcinoma of the colon.
        Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2017; 11: 791-796https://doi.org/10.1159/000485558
        • Choi J.W.
        • Park H.U.
        Adenosquamous carcinoma of the ascending colon: a case report and review of the literature.
        Ann Coloproctol. 2013; 29 (Epub 2013 Apr 30): 83-86https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.2.83
        • Ishida H.
        • et al.
        A case report of ascending colon adenosquamous carcinoma with BRAF V600E mutation.
        Int Cancer Conf J. 2017; 6: 93-97https://doi.org/10.1007/s13691-017-0283-0
        • Frizelle F.A.
        • et al.
        Adenosquamous and squamous carcinoma of the colon and upper rectum: a clinical and histopathologic study.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2001; 44: 341-346https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234730
        • Hijikawa T.
        • et al.
        [A case of adenosquamous carcinoma of the ascending colon].
        Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2015; 42: 1271-1273
        • Schneider 2nd, T.A.
        • Birkett D.H.
        • Vernava 3rd, A.M.
        Primary adenosquamous and squamous cell carcinoma of the colon and rectum.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992; 7: 144-147https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00360355
        • Shafaghi A.
        • et al.
        Adenosquamous carcinoma of the sigmoid colon: a case report and review of literature.
        Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013; 6: 390-392
        • Toumi O.
        • et al.
        Adenosquamous carcinoma of the right colon: a case report and review of the literature.
        Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018; 50 (Epub 2018 Jul 11): 119-121https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.07.001
        • Nasseri Y.
        • et al.
        Adenosquamous carcinoma: an aggressive histologic sub-type of colon cancer with poor prognosis.
        Am J Surg. 2020; (Epub 2020 Aug 22)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.07.038
        • Lan Y.T.
        • et al.
        A nation-wide cancer registry-based study of adenosquamous carcinoma in taiwan.
        PLoS One. 2015; 10 (eCollection 2015)e0139748https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139748
        • Michelassi F.
        • et al.
        Squamous-cell carcinoma of the colon. Experience at the University of Chicago, review of the literature, report of two cases.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1988; 31: 228-235https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02552552
      1. Surveillance, epidemiology, and End results (SEER) Program.
        (SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 18 Regs Research Data + Hurricane Katrina Impacted Louisiana Cases, Nov 2017 Sub (2000-2015) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment> - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969-2016 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, released April 2018, based on the November 2017 submission)
      2. Joinpoint Regression Program, Version 4.8.0.1 - April 2020; Statistical Methodology and Applications Branch, Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute.

        • Park H.S.
        • et al.
        Limitations and biases of the surveillance, epidemiology, and End results database.
        Curr Probl Canc. 2012; 36: 216-224https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2012.03.011