Advertisement

Graduate Medical Education “Trainee in difficulty” current remediation practices and outcomes

  • Qi Yan
    Affiliations
    Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA

    South Texas Center for Vascular Care, South Texas Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Rebecca N. Treffalls
    Affiliations
    University of the Incarnate World School of Medicine, San Antonio, TX, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Taoran Li
    Affiliations
    Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Morningside-West Hospital, New York, NY, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Sanaa Prasla
    Affiliations
    Department of Surgery, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Mark G. Davies
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery South Texas Center for Vascular Care, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MC7741, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
    Affiliations
    Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA

    South Texas Center for Vascular Care, South Texas Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
    Search for articles by this author
Published:December 29, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.12.031

      HIGHLIGHTS

      • Significant heterogeneity existed for prevalence not explained by specialty.
      • Overall attrition in trainees in difficulty was 18%.
      • Trainees in difficulty had lower odds of board certification.
      • Attrition was not found to be different in trainees in difficulty.
      • Standardized criteria and better reporting of outcome is necessary.

      Abstract

      Background

      Trainees in difficulty require additional support to complete training program and become successful physicians. This study reviewed the current remediation practices and outcomes of trainees in difficulty.

      Methods

      A PRISMA-based literature review was performed. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects model.

      Results

      30 studies met inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies surveyed program directors and 14 were observational. Prevalence and attrition of trainees in difficulty ranged widely from 2.0% to 30.7% and 0.0%–50.0%, respectively, with significant heterogeneity. Pooled odds of attrition was higher for trainees in difficulty, however, the confidence interval crossed one and there was statistically significant heterogeneity. Residents in difficulty were significantly less likely to become board certified (OR = 0.08, 95%-CI = 0.04–0.18; I2 = 0%, P = .70).

      Conclusion

      Trainees in difficulty were less likely to be board certified but attrition rate did not differ. Future studies with standardized criteria for trainees in difficulty and better reporting of the outcomes can better guide our remediation practices.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Dupras D.M.
        • Edson R.S.
        • Halvorsen A.J.
        • et al.
        Problem residents": prevalence, problems and remediation in the era of core competencies.
        Am J Med. 2012; 125: 421-425https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.12.008
        • Tabby D.S.
        • Majeed M.H.
        • Schwartzman R.J.
        Problem neurology residents: a national survey.
        Neurology. 2011; 76: 2119-2123https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821f4636
        • Cooley-Wilder S.
        Resident in difficulty: a personal story.
        Fam Med. 2016; 48: 391-392
        • Wynn B.O.
        • Rober S.
        • Kristina M.C.
        Does it cost more to train residents or to replace them? A look at the costs and benefits of operating graduate medical education programs.
        ([May 7, 2021]; Available from:)
        • Gray K.
        • Kaji A.H.
        • Wolfe M.
        • et al.
        Influence of student loan debt on general surgery resident career and lifestyle decision-making.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2020; 230: 173-181
        • Bergen P.C.
        • Littlefield J.H.
        • O'Keefe G.E.
        • et al.
        Identification of high-risk residents.
        J Surg Res. 2000; 92: 239-244https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.2000.5924
        • Guevara M.
        • Grewald Y.
        • Hutchinson K.
        • et al.
        Individualized education plans in medical education.
        Conn Med. 2011; 75: 537-540
        • Yaghoubian A.
        • Galante J.
        • Kaji A.
        • et al.
        General surgery resident remediation and attrition: a multi-institutional study.
        Arch Surg. 2012; 147: 829-833https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1676
        • Yao D.C.
        • Wright S.M.
        National survey of internal medicine residency program directors regarding problem residents.
        J Am Med Assoc. 2000; 284: 1099-1104https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.9.1099
        • Pirie JSA L.
        • Glover Takahashi S.
        Managing residents in difficulty within CBME residency educational systems: a scoping review.
        BMC Med Educ. 2020; 20: 235https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02150-0
        • Shearer Cb M.
        • Bergin F.
        • Sargeant J.
        • Warren A.
        Remediation in Canadian medical residency programs: established and emerging best practices.
        Med Teach. 2019; 41: 28-35https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2018.1436164
        • To H.C.
        • A
        • Tobin S.
        • Nestel D.
        Remediation of underperformance in surgical trainees – a scoping review.
        J Surg Educ. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.10.010
        • CanMEDS
        Better standards, better physicians, better care.
        (Available from:)
        • Melton W.
        • Jackson 3rd, J.B.
        • Koon D.
        • Grabowski G.
        Orthopaedic resident remediation: frequency, interventions, and outcomes.
        JB JS Open Access. 2018; 3e0011https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.Oa.18.00011
        • Rosenblatt M.A.
        • Schartel S.A.
        Evaluation, feedback, and remediation in anesthesiology residency training: a survey of 124 United States programs.
        J Clin Anesth. 1999; 11: 519-527https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8180%2899%2900084-7
        • Riebschleger MPH H.M.
        Remediation in the context of the competencies: a survey of pediatrics residency program directors.
        J Grad Med Educ. 2013; 5: 60-63https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-12-00024.1
        • Torbeck L.
        • Canal D.F.
        Remediation practices for surgery residents.
        Am J Surg. 2009; 197: 397-402https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.10.008
        • Bhatti N.I.
        • Ahmed A.
        • Stewart M.G.
        • et al.
        Remediation of problematic residents–A national survey.
        Laryngoscope. 2016; 126: 834-838https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25599
        • Resnick A.S.
        • Mullen J.L.
        • Kaiser L.R.
        • Morris J.B.
        Patterns and predictions of resident misbehavior-A 10-year retrospective look.
        Curr Surg. 2006; 63: 418-425https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cursur.2006.05.004
        • Williams R.G.
        • Roberts N.K.
        • Schwind C.J.
        • Dunnington G.L.
        The nature of general surgery resident performance problems.
        Surgery. 2009; 145: 651-658https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.01.019
        • Silverberg MW M.
        • Murano T.
        • Smith J.L.
        • Burkhardt J.C.
        • Santen S.A.
        What is the prevalence and success of remediation of emergency medicine residents?.
        West J Emerg Med. 2015; 16: 839-844https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.9.27357
        • Turner J.A.
        • Fitzsimons M.G.
        • Pardo Jr., M.C.
        • et al.
        Effect of performance deficiencies on graduation and board certification rates: a 10-yr multicenter study of anesthesiology residents.
        Anesthesiology. 2016; 125: 221-229https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000001142
        • Raman H.S.
        • Limbrick D.D.
        • Ray W.Z.
        • et al.
        Prevalence, management, and outcome of problem residents among neurosurgical training programs in the United States.
        J Neurosurg. 2018; 130: 322-326https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.8.Jns171719
        • Binenbaum G.
        • Volpe N.J.
        Ophthalmology resident surgical competency. a national survey.
        Ophthalmology. 2006; 113: 1237-1244https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.03.026
        • Badran K.W.
        • Kelley K.
        • Conderman C.
        • et al.
        Improving applicant selection: identifying qualities of the unsuccessful otolaryngology resident.
        Laryngoscope. 2015; 125: 842-847https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24860
        • Brown DJT R.E.
        • Bhatti N.I.
        Assessment of operative competency in otolaryngology residency: survey of US program directors.
        Laryngoscope. 2008; 118: 1761-1764
        • Weizberg M.S.
        • J L.
        • Murano T.
        • Silverberg M.
        • Santen S.A.
        What does remediation and probation status mean? a survey of emergency medicine residency program directors.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2015; 22: 113-116https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12559
        • Adams K.E.
        • Emmons S.
        • Romm J.
        How resident unprofessional behavior is identified and managed: a program director survey.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198 (692.e691-695)
        • Torbeck LW A.S.
        A method for defining competency-based promotion criteria for family medicine residents.
        Acad Med. 2005; 80: 832-839https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200509000-00010
        • Reamy B.V.
        • Harman J.H.
        Residents in trouble: an in-depth assessment of the 25-year experience of a single family medicine residency.
        Fam Med. 2006; 38: 252-257
        • Edeiken B.S.
        Remedial program for diagnostic radiology residents.
        Invest Radiol. 1993; 28: 269-274
        • Warburton K.M.
        • Goren E.
        • Dine C.J.
        Comprehensive assessment of struggling learners referred to a graduate medical education remediation program.
        J Grad Med Educ. 2017; 9: 763-767https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-17-00175.1
        • Zbieranowski IT S.G.
        • Verma S.
        • Spadafora S.M.
        Remediation of residents in difficulty: a retrospective 10-year review of the experience of a postgraduate board of examiners.
        Acad Med. 2013; 88: 111-116https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182764cb6
        • Guerrasio J.G.
        • M J.
        • Aagaard E.M.
        Learner deficits and academic outcomes of medical students, residents, fellows, and attending physicians referred to a remediation program, 2006-2012.
        Acad Med. 2014; 89: 352-358https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000122
        • Audétat M.C.
        • Voirol C.
        • Béland N.
        • et al.
        Remediation plans in family medicine residency.
        Can Fam Physician. 2015; 61: e425-e434
        • Sparks J.W.L.-O.
        • M
        • Vinson A.
        • et al.
        Individualized remediation during fellowship training.
        J Clin Anesth. 2016; 34: 452-458https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.004
        • Lacasse M.
        • Audétat M.C.
        • É Boileau
        • et al.
        Interventions for undergraduate and postgraduate medical learners with academic difficulties: a BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 56.
        Med Teach. 2019; 41: 981-1001https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2019.1596239