Advertisement

The power of suction: Theory and practice in closed suction vs gravity drains and postoperative pancreatic fistulas

      Highlights

      • POPF related outcomes do not vary with drainage method following pancreatic resection.
      • Gland texture, PDAC/chronic pancreatitis histology, and EBL are risk factors for POPF in all types of pancreas resection.
      • Drain method should be per surgeon preference with consideration for patient and nursing specific factors.

      Abstract

      Background

      Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a feared complication in pancreatic resection. Gravity drainage (GD) is hypothesized to reduce POPF versus closed-suction drainage (CSD). We sought to evaluate this theory.

      Methods

      Six-hundred-twenty-nine patients undergoing pancreatic resection between 2013 and 2020 were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression for the outcomes of POPF and clinically-relevant POPF (crPOPF).

      Results

      Three-hundred-ninety-seven patients (63.1%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and 232 (36.9%) underwent distal pancreatectomy. Suction drains were placed in 588 patients (93.5%) whereas 41 (6.5%) had GDs. One-hundred-twenty-five (27.6%) experienced a POPF; 49 (10%) crPOPFs. On multivariable analysis, suction drainage was not associated with increased risk of POPF (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.30–1.93, P = 0.57) or crPOPF (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.30–3.26, P = 0.98).

      Conclusion

      Suction drainage does not promote POPF when compared to GDs. Drain type should be determined by surgeon preference, while taking into account nursing and patient-specific considerations especially when patients are discharged with drains.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Diener M.K.
        • Tadjalli-Mehr K.
        • Wente M.N.
        • et al.
        Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence.
        Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2011 Jan; 396 (PubMed PMID: 20963439. Epub 2010/10/22. eng): 41-52
        • Van Buren 2nd, G.
        • Bloomston M.
        • Hughes S.J.
        • et al.
        A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage.
        Ann Surg. 2014 Apr; 259 (PubMed PMID: 24374513. Epub 2014/01/01. eng): 605-612
        • Nitsche U.
        • Müller T.C.
        • Späth C.
        • et al.
        The evidence based dilemma of intraperitoneal drainage for pancreatic resection – a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        BMC Surg. 2014 Oct 8; 14 (PubMed PMID: 25291982. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4193685. Epub 2014/10/09. eng): 76
        • Čečka F.
        • Loveček M.
        • Jon B.
        • et al.
        Intra-abdominal drainage following pancreatic resection: a systematic review.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct 28; 21 (PubMed PMID: 26523110. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4616221. Epub 2015/11/03. eng): 11458-11468
        • Havey R.
        • Herriman E.
        • OʼBrien D.
        Guarding the gut: early mobility after abdominal surgery.
        Crit Care Nurs Q. 2013 Jan-Mar; 36 (PubMed PMID: 23221443. Epub 2012/12/12. eng): 63-72
        • Yip V.S.
        • Dunne D.F.
        • Samuels S.
        • et al.
        Adherence to early mobilisation: key for successful enhanced recovery after liver resection.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct; 42 (PubMed PMID: 27528466. Epub 2016/08/17. eng): 1561-1567
        • Cheng Y.
        • Xia J.
        • Lai M.
        • et al.
        Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 21; 10 (PubMed PMID: 27764898. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC6611488. Epub 2016/11/02. eng): Cd010583
        • Zhang W.
        • He S.
        • Cheng Y.
        • et al.
        Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 21; 6 (PubMed PMID: 29928755. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC6513487 none known. ZL: none known. Epub 2018/06/22. eng): Cd010583
        • Aumont O.
        • Dupré A.
        • Abjean A.
        • et al.
        Does intraoperative closed-suction drainage influence the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy?.
        BMC Surg. 2017 May 16; 17 (PubMed PMID: 28511699. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC5434540. Epub 2017/05/18. eng): 58
        • Čečka F.
        • Jon B.
        • Skalický P.
        • et al.
        Results of a randomized controlled trial comparing closed-suction drains versus passive gravity drains after pancreatic resection.
        Surgery. 2018 Nov; 164 (PubMed PMID: 30082139. Epub 2018/08/08. eng): 1057-1063
        • Lemke M.
        • Park L.
        • Balaa F.K.
        • et al.
        Passive versus active intra-abdominal drainage following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study using the American college of surgeons NSQIP database.
        World J Surg. 2021 Feb; 45 (PubMed PMID: 33078216. Epub 2020/10/21. eng): 554-561
        • Hall B.R.
        • Egr Z.H.
        • Krell R.W.
        • et al.
        Association of gravity drainage and complications following Whipple: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP targeted database.
        World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr 14; 19 (PubMed PMID: 33853623. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC8048035. Epub 2021/04/16. eng): 118
        • Park L.J.
        • Baker L.
        • Smith H.
        • et al.
        Passive versus active intra-abdominal drainage following pancreatic resection: does A superior drainage system exist? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        World J Surg. 2021 Sep; 45 (PubMed PMID: 34046692. Epub 2021/05/29. eng): 2895-2910
        • Gachabayov M.
        • Gogna S.
        • Latifi R.
        • Dong X.D.
        Passive drainage to gravity and closed-suction drainage following pancreatoduodenectomy lead to similar grade B and C postoperative pancreatic fistula rates. A meta-analysis.
        Int J Surg. 2019 Jul; 67 (PubMed PMID: 31078675. Epub 2019/05/13. eng): 24-31
        • Kone L.B.
        • Maker V.K.
        • Banulescu M.
        • Maker A.V.
        Should drains suck? A propensity score analysis of closed-suction versus closed-gravity drainage after pancreatectomy.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 May; 25 (PubMed PMID: 32394123. Epub 2020/05/13. eng): 1224-1232
        • Bassi C.
        • Dervenis C.
        • Butturini G.
        • et al.
        Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition.
        Surgery. 2005 Jul; 138 (PubMed PMID: 16003309. Epub 2005/07/09. eng): 8-13
        • Ecker B.L.
        • McMillan M.T.
        • Allegrini V.
        • et al.
        Risk factors and mitigation strategies for pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: analysis of 2026 resections from the international, multi-institutional distal pancreatectomy study group.
        Ann Surg. 2019 Jan; 269 (PubMed PMID: 28857813. Epub 2017/09/01. eng): 143-149
        • Mirrielees J.A.
        • Weber S.M.
        • Abbott D.E.
        • et al.
        Pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying are the highest-impact complications after whipple.
        J Surg Res. 2020 Jun; 250 (PubMed PMID: 32023494. Epub 2020/02/06. eng): 80-87
        • Langelotz C.
        • Mueller-Rau C.
        • Terziyski S.
        • et al.
        Gender-specific differences in surgical site infections: an analysis of 438,050 surgical procedures from the German national nosocomial infections surveillance system.
        Viszeralmedizin. 2014 Apr; 30 (PubMed PMID: 26288585. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4513817. Epub 2014/04/01. eng): 114-117
        • Klaiber U.
        • Sauer P.
        • Martin E.
        • et al.
        Protocol of a andomized controlled phase II clinical trial investigating PREoperative endoscopic injection of BOTulinum toxin into the sphincter of Oddi to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: the PREBOTPilot trial.
        BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 2; 10 (PubMed PMID: 32878758. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC7470495. Epub 2020/09/04. eng)e036815
        • Zhang W.
        • Wei Z.
        • Che X.
        Effect of polyglycolic acid mesh for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Medicine (Baltim). 2020 Aug 21; 99 (PubMed PMID: 32846759. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC7447380. Epub 2020/08/28. eng)e21456
        • Peng J.S.
        • Joyce D.
        • Brady M.
        • et al.
        Risk-stratified analysis of pasireotide for patients undergoing pancreatectomy.
        J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug; 122 (PubMed PMID: 32474957. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC7369221. Epub 2020/06/01. eng): 195-203