Advertisement

How to perform an effective literature review

      Graphical abstract

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.
        https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current
        Date accessed: December 12, 2021
        • Richardson W.S.
        • Wilson M.C.
        • Nishikawa J.
        • Hayward R.S.
        The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions.
        ACP J Club. 1995; 123: A12-A13
        • Methley A.M.
        • Campbell S.
        • Chew-Graham C.
        • McNally R.
        • Cheraghi-Sohi S.
        PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14: 579https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0
        • Hoogendam A.
        • de Vries Robbé P.F.
        • Overbeke A.J.P.M.
        Comparing patient characteristics, type of intervention, control, and outcome (PICO) queries with unguided searching: a randomized controlled crossover trial.
        J Med Libr Assoc JMLA. 2012; 100: 121-126https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.100.2.010
        • Eriksen M.B.
        • Frandsen T.F.
        The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review.
        J Med Libr Assoc JMLA. 2018; 106: 420-431https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.345
        • Brown D.
        A review of the PubMed PICO tool: using evidence-based practice in health education.
        Health Promot Pract. 2020; 21: 496-498https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839919893361
        • Rathbone J.
        • Carter M.
        • Hoffmann T.
        • Glasziou P.
        A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
        Syst Rev. 2016; 5: 27https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0197-5
        • Nourbakhsh E.
        • Nugent R.
        • Wang H.
        • Cevik C.
        • Nugent K.
        Medical literature searches: a comparison of PubMed and google scholar.
        Health Inf Libr J. 2012; 29: 214-222https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2012.00992.x
        • Bramer W.M.
        • Giustini D.
        • Kramer B.M.R.
        Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study.
        Syst Rev. 2016; 5: 39https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0215-7