Advertisement

Variation in adoption of skin and nipple sparing mastectomy: An opportunity to enhance patient outcomes

      Highlights

      • Nipple-sparing mastectomies are cosmetically preferable and oncologically safe.
      • Patients have reports improved psychosocial well-being with NSM.
      • Surgeon volume and neoadjuvant therapy were associated with increased odds of NSM.
      • Opportunities for low-volume surgeons to enhance patient outcomes.

      Abstract

      Background

      Nipple-sparing mastectomies (NSM) for breast cancer are under-utilized. We sought to investigate NSM utilization.

      Methods

      Females with nonmetastatic breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the Legacy Health System from 2007 to 2020 were identified. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to evaluate odds of receiving NSM.

      Results

      Three-thousand-four-hundred-seventeen mastectomies were performed with 772 undergoing NSM. On multivariable analysis, later year (OR 1.22/year, P < 0.001), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 1.33, P = 0.04), HR+ (OR 1.61, P = 0.001) and surgeon volume (OR 1.16/10 yearly mastectomies, P < 0.001) were independently associated with increased odds of receiving a NSM while age (OR 0.94/year, P < 0.001), IDC (OR 0.58, P = 0.01), T3/T4 stage (OR 0.36, P = 0.009), and clinical node positivity (OR 0.63, P = 0.003) were independently associated with decreased odds. Surgeon volume was not associated with odds of receiving a non-NSM with reconstruction (OR 1.01 P = 0.48).

      Conclusion

      NSM is under-utilized by low-volume breast surgeons. Understanding barriers to adoption is an is an opportunity to enhance patient-centered outcomes.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Elmore L.C.
        • Dietz J.R.
        • Myckatyn T.M.
        • Margenthaler J.A.
        The landmark series: mastectomy trials (Skin-Sparing and nipple-sparing and reconstruction landmark trials).
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan; 28 (PubMed PMID: 32886286. Epub 2020/09/05. eng): 273-280
        • Howard M.A.
        • Sisco M.
        • Yao K.
        • et al.
        Patient satisfaction with nipple-sparing mastectomy: a prospective study of patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q.
        J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep; 114 (PubMed PMID: 27393183. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC5588895. Epub 2016/07/10. eng): 416-422
        • Djohan R.
        • Gage E.
        • Gatherwright J.
        • et al.
        Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Mar; 125 (PubMed PMID: 20195110. Epub 2010/03/03. eng): 818-829
        • Lee C.
        • Sunu C.
        • Pignone M.
        Patient-reported outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a systematic review.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Jul; 209 (PubMed PMID: 19651073. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC2721826. Epub 2009/08/05. eng): 123-133
        • Bykowski M.R.
        • Emelife P.I.
        • Emelife N.N.
        • et al.
        Nipple-areola complex reconstruction improves psychosocial and sexual well-being in women treated for breast cancer.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2017 Feb; 70 (PubMed PMID: 27988150. Epub 2016/12/19. eng): 209-214
        • Dossett L.A.
        • Lowe J.
        • Sun W.
        • et al.
        Prospective evaluation of skin and nipple-areola sensation and patient satisfaction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
        J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jul; 114 (PubMed PMID: 27087574. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC7771573. Epub 2016/04/19. eng): 11-16
        • Metcalfe K.A.
        • Cil T.D.
        • Semple J.L.
        • et al.
        Long-Term psychosocial functioning in women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: does preservation of the nipple-areolar complex make a difference?.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct; 22 (PubMed PMID: 26208581. Epub 2015/07/26. eng): 3324-3330
        • Wei C.H.
        • Scott A.M.
        • Price A.N.
        • et al.
        Psychosocial and sexual well-being following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction.
        Breast J. 2016; 22: 10-17
        • Atisha D.
        • Alderman A.K.
        • Lowery J.C.
        • et al.
        Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study.
        Ann Surg. 2008 Jun; 247 (PubMed PMID: 18520230. Epub 2008/06/04. eng): 1019-1028
        • Romanoff A.
        • Zabor E.C.
        • Stempel M.
        • et al.
        A comparison of patient-reported outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy and conventional mastectomy with reconstruction.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct; 25 (PubMed PMID: 29968023. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC6205203. Epub 2018/07/04. eng): 2909-2916
        • Bailey C.R.
        • Ogbuagu O.
        • Baltodano P.A.
        • et al.
        Quality-of-Life outcomes improve with nipple-sparing mastectomy and breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Aug; 140 (PubMed PMID: 28746266. Epub 2017/07/27. eng): 219-226
        • Galimberti V.
        • Vicini E.
        • Corso G.
        • et al.
        Nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy: review of aims, oncological safety and contraindications.
        Breast. 2017 Aug; 34 (S82-s4) (PubMed PMID: 28673535. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC5837802. Epub 2017/07/05. eng)
        • Medina-Franco H.
        • Vasconez L.O.
        • Fix R.J.
        • et al.
        Factors associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer.
        Ann Surg. 2002 Jun; 235 (PubMed PMID: 12035037. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC1422510. Epub 2002/05/30. eng): 814-819
        • Gerber B.
        • Krause A.
        • Reimer T.
        • et al.
        Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure.
        Ann Surg. 2003 Jul; 238 (PubMed PMID: 12832974. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC1422651. Epub 2003/07/02. eng): 120-127
        • Murthy V.
        • Chamberlain R.S.
        Defining a place for nipple sparing mastectomy in modern breast care: an evidence based review.
        Breast J. 2013 Nov-Dec; 19 (PubMed PMID: 22284266. Epub 2012/01/31. eng): 571-581
        • Network N.C.C.
        NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer, version 8.2021.
        NCCN.org. 2021 Sept 13; (Report No): 2021
        • Valero M.G.
        • Muhsen S.
        • Moo T.A.
        • et al.
        Increase in utilization of nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer: indications, complications, and oncologic outcomes.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Feb; 27 (PubMed PMID: 31823173. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC6952567. Epub 2019/12/12. eng): 344-351
        • Wu Z.Y.
        • Kim H.J.
        • Lee J.
        • et al.
        Oncologic safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancer and tumor-to-nipple distance ≤ 1 cm: a matched cohort study.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug; 28 (PubMed PMID: 33423119. Epub 2021/01/11. eng): 4284-4291
        • Bekeny J.C.
        • Singh T.
        • Luvisa K.
        • et al.
        Delivery of nipple-sparing mastectomy within a single healthcare system: the impact of provider preferences.
        Breast J. 2021 Feb; 27 (PubMed PMID: 33274577. Epub 2020/12/05. eng): 149-157
        • Sisco M.
        • Kyrillos A.M.
        • Lapin B.R.
        • et al.
        Trends and variation in the use of nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer in the United States.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Nov; 160 (PubMed PMID: 27620883. Epub 2016/09/14. eng): 111-120
        • Wong S.M.
        • Chun Y.S.
        • Sagara Y.
        • et al.
        National patterns of breast reconstruction and nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer, 2005-2015.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct; 26 (PubMed PMID: 31342383. Epub 2019/07/26. eng): 3194-3203