Advertisement
Invited Commentary| Volume 224, ISSUE 6, P1480-1481, December 2022

Surgical instrument fit - What's (hand) size got to do with it?

      We read with much interest the article “Gender-differences of proceduralists in perception of hand-held surgical instrument fit – A cross-sectional survey” by Weinriech et al.
      • Weinreich H.M.
      • Babu M.
      • Kamil R.
      • Williams Q.
      • Buhimschi I.A.
      Gender-differences of proceduralists in perception of hand-held surgical instrument fit–A cross-sectional survey.
      We would like to commend the authors on their study of a very important topic, that of the mismatch between human hand size (using glove size as a proxy) and hand-held surgical instrument fit. However, the results of this study need to be interpreted in the context of the following points.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Weinreich H.M.
        • Babu M.
        • Kamil R.
        • Williams Q.
        • Buhimschi I.A.
        Gender-differences of proceduralists in perception of hand-held surgical instrument fit–A cross-sectional survey.
        Am J Surg. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.05.011
        • Garrett J.W.
        The adult human hand: some anthropometric and biomechanical considerations.
        Hum Factors. 1971; 13: 117-131
        • Webb Associates
        • Webb Associates
        • Yellow Springs, Ohio. Anthropology Research Project, Space Administration. Scientific, & Technical Information Office
        Anthropometric Source Book: Anthropometry for designers. 1–3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Office, 1978 (NASA Source book-RP-1024)
        • Hallbeck M.S.
        • McMullin D.L.
        Maximal power grasp and three-jaw chuck pinch force as a function of wrist position, age, and glove type.
        Int J Ind Ergon. 1993; 11: 195-206
        • Armijo P.R.
        • Flores L.
        • Pokala B.
        • Huang C.K.
        • Siu K.C.
        • Oleynikov D.
        Gender equity in ergonomics: does muscle effort in laparoscopic surgery differ between men and women?.
        Surg Endosc. 2022; 36: 396-401
        • Sutton E.
        • Irvin M.
        • Zeigler C.
        • Lee G.
        • Park A.
        The ergonomics of women in surgery.
        Surg Endosc. 2014; 28: 1051-1055
        • Society of Surgical Ergonomics
        Society of Surgical Ergonomics.org.
        2022