Highlights
- •Diameter of veins used for AVF creation measured larger on intra versus preoperative mapping.
- •Assessing veins via intraoperative mapping leads to more distal AVF creation.
- •Utilizing intraoperative vein mapping does not compromise AVF maturation results.
Abstract
Background
We assessed the utility of intraoperative vein mapping performed by the operating
surgeon for evaluating vessel suitability for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation.
Methods
In a retrospective review of 222 AVFs, vein diameter measurements were compared between
intraoperative and preoperative mapping in the same anatomical location. AVF creation
was based on intraoperative vein diameter ≥2 mm, using a distal to proximal and superficial
veins first approach. Potential selection of access type based on preoperative findings
alone was analyzed.
Results
The mean diameter of the veins used for AVF creation measured 3.6 ± 0.8 mm on intraoperative
duplex versus 2.5 ± 0.9 mm when the same veins were measured on preoperative duplex.
Based on preoperative mapping alone, 23% of patients would have received a more proximal
AVF and 5% would have needed a graft. AVFs created more distally based on intraoperative
findings had similar maturation rates compared to the rest of the cohort, 79% versus
84% (p = 0.2).
Conclusions
Intraoperative vein mapping can be used to evaluate vessel suitability for AVF and
compared to pre-operative vein mapping may increase the eligibility of distal veins
for fistula creation while reducing the need for AV grafts.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to The American Journal of SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- US renal data System 2020 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States.Am J Kidney Dis. 2021; 77: A7-A8https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.01.002
- KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update.Am J Kidney Dis. 2020; 75: S1-S164https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.12.001
- Fistula first initiative: historical impact on vascular access practice patterns and influence on future vascular access care.Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2017; 8: 244-254https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-017-0319-9
- Randomized clinical trial of selective versus routine preoperative duplex ultrasound imaging before arteriovenous fistula surgery.J Vasc Surg. 2014; 60: 533https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.097
- Preoperative point-of-care ultrasound and its impact on arteriovenous fistula maturation outcomes.J Vasc Surg. 2018; 68: 1157-1165https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.051
- Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus anaesthesia improves arteriovenous fistula flow characteristics in end-stage renal disease patients.South Afr J Anaesth Analg. 2015; 21: 131-134https://doi.org/10.1080/22201181.2015.1075764
- Comparison between local and regional anesthesia in arteriovenous fistula creation.J Vasc Access. 2011; 12: 331-335https://doi.org/10.5301/JVA.2011.8560
- Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block enhances postoperative blood flow in arteriovenous fistulas.J Vasc Surg. 2011; 54: 749-753https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.12.045
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.J Biomed Inf. 2009; 42: 377-381https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
- Functional outcomes of arteriovenous fistulas recruited with regional anesthesia.in: Journal of Vascular Surgery. vol. 71. Mosby Inc., 2020: 584-591https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.03.083 (e1)
- Postanesthesia ultrasound facilitates creation of more preferred accesses without affecting access survival.J Vasc Surg. 2019; 69: 898-905https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.223
Society of Vascular Ultrasound. Upper Extremity Mapping for Creation of Dialysis Access or Bypass Graft. www.svunet.org.
- The role of duplex ultrasound in assessing arteriovenous fistula maturation.J Vasc Surg. 2019; 69e30https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.013
- Maturation rates of arteriovenous fistulas using small veins in the era of endovascular interventions.Ann Vasc Surg. 2021; 71: 208-214https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.109
- Vein diameter is the major predictor of fistula maturation.J Vasc Surg. 2009; 49: 1499-1504https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2009.02.018
- Regional anesthesia for vascular access surgery.Anesth Analg. 2009; 109: 976-980https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181adc208
- Long-term functional patency and cost-effectiveness of arteriovenous fistula creation under regional anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020; 31: 1871-1882https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2019111209
- Regional nerve block Allows for optimization of planning in the creation of arteriovenous access for hemodialysis by improving superficial venous dilatation.Ann Vasc Surg. 2007; 21: 730-733https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2007.07.001
- Improving Dialysis Access: Regional Anesthesia Improves Arteriovenous Fistula Prevalence.2010
- Pre-operative regional block anesthesia enhances operative strategy for arteriovenous fistula creation.J Vasc Access. 2011; 12: 336-340https://doi.org/10.5301/JVA.2011.8827
- A comparison of preoperative and intraoperative vein mapping sizes for arteriovenous fistula creation.J Vasc Surg. 2018; 67: 1813-1820https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.067
- The role of venous diameter in predicting arteriovenous fistula maturation: when not to expect an AVF to mature according to pre-operative vein diameter measurements? A best evidence topic.Int J Surg. 2015; 15: 95-99https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.035
Article info
Publication history
Published online: September 22, 2022
Accepted:
September 18,
2022
Received in revised form:
July 11,
2022
Received:
April 18,
2022
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.