Advertisement

79 is the new 70: Left digit bias in craniotomy

Published:October 11, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.10.008

      Highlights

      • Left digit bias may be present in treatment of traumatic brain injury with craniotomy in the elderly population.
      • Patients aged 79 more likely to undergo craniotomy than patients aged 80.
      • Left digit bias not present in patients aged 69 vs 70.

      Abstract

      Background

      Left digit bias is the psychological phenomenon in which the difference between values is perceived as larger due to the value of the first digit. For example, an 80 year old may be perceived as much older than a 79 year old. We sought to determine if left digit bias is present in craniotomy for elderly patients with traumatic brain injury.

      Methods

      Patients aged 69, 70, 79, and 80 with traumatic brain injury and an abbreviated injury scale severity of a minimum of 3 were included from the National Trauma Data Bank from the years 2012-2019. 38,908 patients were included. A Chi-squared Test was performed to compare the percentage of patients undergoing craniotomy.

      Results

      79 year olds had higher craniotomy rates than 80 year olds (7.8% vs 6.4%, P < 0.001). There was no difference in craniotomy rates between 69 and 70 year olds (8.2% vs 7.8%, P < 0.2622).

      Conclusion

      This study suggests the presence of left digit bias in the decision to perform a craniotomy in patients aged 79 vs 80 with traumatic brain injury.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Report to Congress on Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Epidemiology and Rehabilitation.
        National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, Atlanta GA2015
        • Scotti P.
        • Séguin C.
        • Lo B.W.Y.
        • et al.
        Antithrombotic agents and traumatic brain injury in the elderly population: hemorrhage patterns and outcomes.
        J Neurosurg. 2019; : 1-10https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.4.JNS19252
        • Sahuquillo J.
        • Dennis J.A.
        Craniectomy for the treatment of high intracranial pressure in closed traumatic brain injury.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 31; 12 (PMID: 31887790; PMCID: PMC6953357)CD003983https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003983.pub3
        • Skaansar O.
        • Tverdal C.
        • Rønning P.A.
        • et al.
        Traumatic brain injury-the effects of patient age on treatment intensity and mortality.
        BMC Neurol. 2020; 20: 376
        • Lilley E.J.
        • Williams K.J.
        • Schneider E.B.
        • et al.
        Intensity of treatment, end-of-life care, and mortality for older patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
        J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016; 80: 998-1004https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001028
        • Lau D.
        • El-Sayed A.M.
        • Ziewacz J.E.
        • et al.
        Postoperative outcomes following closed head injury and craniotomy for evacuation of hematoma in patients older than 80 years.
        J Neurosurg. 2012 Jan; 116 (Epub 2011 Aug 26. PMID: 21888477): 234-245https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.7.JNS11396
        • Posti J.P.
        • Luoto T.M.
        • Rautava P.
        • Kytö V.
        Mortality after trauma craniotomy is decreasing in older adults-a nationwide population-based study.
        World Neurosurg. 2021; 152: e313-e320https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.090
        • Saposnik G.
        • Redelmeier D.
        • Ruff C.C.
        • Tobler P.N.
        Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review.
        BMC Med Inf Decis Making. 2016; 16: 138https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0377-1
        • Olenski A.R.
        • Zimerman A.
        • Coussens S.
        • Jena A.B.
        Behavioral heuristics in coronary-artery bypass graft surgery.
        N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 778-779https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1911289
        • Dalmacy D.M.
        • Diaz A.
        • Hyer M.
        • Pawlik T.M.
        Age-based left-digit bias in the management of acute cholecystitis.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2021; 25: 3239-3241https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05065-3
        • Husain S.A.
        • King K.L.
        • Mohan S.
        Left-digit bias and deceased donor kidney utilization.
        Clin Transplant. 2021; 35e14284https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14284