Advertisement

The impact of waste reduction in general surgery operating rooms

Published:October 16, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.10.033

      Highlights

      • Operating rooms are responsible for a significant portion of hospital waste.
      • An intervention to reduce unused supplies in surgical packs is feasible.
      • Eliminating unused surgical items from standard packs is cost-saving and reduces waste.

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Operating rooms are responsible for a significant burden of waste and negative environmental impact. This study aimed to reduce OR waste and improve both environmental impact and hospital cost savings.

      Methods

      The unused items in two standard single-use surgical packs were tracked for general surgery cases. A new pack was created excluding the most frequently unused items. The feasibility of the new pack was then tested, and a projected cost savings analysis was performed.

      Results

      A total of 35 general surgery operations were tracked using two standard packs ($89.51 or $93.68 per case, each 23.2 lbs). The new pack ($46.88 per case, 20.8 lbs) was then successfully used in nine cases. The projected cost-savings of substituting the new pack was $45,719 annually with a 2437 pounds annual waste reduction.

      Conclusions

      Simple and feasible adjustments to standard single-use surgical packs can have a significant impact on waste reduction and cost-savings.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Paavola J.
        Health impacts of climate change and health and social inequalities in the UK.
        Environ Health. 2017; 16https://doi.org/10.1186/S12940-017-0328-Z
        • Ford H.v.
        • Jones N.H.
        • Davies A.J.
        • et al.
        The fundamental links between climate change and marine plastic pollution.
        Sci Total Environ. 2022; 806150392https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.150392
        • Brandt-Rauf P.
        • Li Y.
        • Long C.
        • Monaco R.
        • Kovvali G.
        • Marion M.J.
        Plastics and carcinogenesis: the example of vinyl chloride.
        J Carcinog. 2012; 11https://doi.org/10.4103/1477-3163.93700
        • Amato-Lourenço L.F.
        • dos Santos Galvão L.
        • de Weger L.A.
        • Hiemstra P.S.
        • Vijver M.G.
        • Mauad T.
        An emerging class of air pollutants: potential effects of microplastics to respiratory human health?.
        Sci Total Environ. 2020; : 749https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2020.141676
        • Kwakye G.
        • Brat G.A.
        • Makary M.A.
        Green surgical practices for health care.
        Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. 1960; 146 (2011): 131-136https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHSURG.2010.343
        • Guetter C.R.
        • Williams B.J.
        • Slama E.
        • et al.
        Greening the operating room.
        Am J Surg. 2018; 216: 683-688https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMJSURG.2018.07.021
        • Ryan M.T.
        • Malmrose J.
        • Riley C.A.
        • Tolisano A.M.
        Operating room waste generated across otolaryngology cases.
        Mil Med. 2021; (Published online December 30, 2021)https://doi.org/10.1093/MILMED/USAB548
        • van Demark R.E.
        • Smith V.J.S.
        • Fiegen A.
        Lean and green hand surgery.
        J Hand Surg. 2018; 43: 179-181https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHSA.2017.11.007
        • Zygourakis C.C.
        • Yoon S.
        • Valencia V.
        • et al.
        Operating room waste: disposable supply utilization in neurosurgical procedures.
        J Neurosurg. 2017; 126: 620-625https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.2.JNS152442
        • Deshpande N.G.
        • Witmer H.D.D.
        • Ç Keceli
        • Adelman D.
        • Turaga K.K.
        Surgical team familiarity and waste generation in the operating room.
        Am J Surg. 2021; 222: 694-699https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMJSURG.2021.05.009
        • Chasseigne V.
        • Leguelinel-Blache G.
        • Nguyen T.L.
        • et al.
        Assessing the costs of disposable and reusable supplies wasted during surgeries.
        Int J Surg. 2018; 53: 18-23https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSU.2018.02.004
        • Albert M.G.
        • Rothkopf D.M.
        Operating room waste reduction in plastic and hand surgery.
        Plastic Surgery. 2015; 23 (Accessed October 2, 2021/pmc/articles/PMC4664137/): 235
        • Babu M.A.
        • Dalenberg A.K.
        • Goodsell G.
        • Holloway A.B.
        • Belau M.M.
        • Link M.J.
        Greening the operating room: results of a scalable initiative to reduce waste and recover supply costs.
        Neurosurgery. 2019; 85: 432-437https://doi.org/10.1093/NEUROS/NYY275
        • Penn E.
        • Yasso S.F.
        • Wei J.L.
        Reducing disposable equipment waste for tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy cases.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 147: 615-618https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599812450681
        • John-Baptiste A.
        • Sowerby L.J.
        • Chin C.J.
        • Martin J.
        • Rotenberg B.W.
        Comparing surgical trays with redundant instruments with trays with reduced instruments: a cost analysis.
        Canadian Medical Association Open Access Journal. 2016; 4: E404-E408https://doi.org/10.9778/CMAJO.20150092