Inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is one of the most commonly performed surgeries by general
surgeons. Prior pelvic or low abdominal surgery has been previously considered by
many surgeons to be a contraindication to minimally invasive IHR due to the scar tissue
formed in the operative space, which may create an increased level of difficulty and
an added potential risk for complications.
1
However, many recent studies have demonstrated that repair with minimally invasive
techniques can be safe in patients who have undergone prior pelvic or low abdominal
surgery.
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
In these studies, there were no statistically significant differences in outcomes
such as injuries to surrounding structures, postoperative complications, length of
stay (LOS), readmission rate, hernia recurrences, or chronic pain. These studies further
demonstrated that there may even be potential benefit to this patient population,
including faster return to activities of daily living (ADLs)
2
and advantages in treatment for bilateral inguinal hernias.
3
In their manuscript, Dr. Amundson et al. compared safety and outcomes of IHR between
open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches with a focus on patient reported quality
of life outcomes.
6
- Amundson J.R.
- Attaar M.
- Forester B.
- et al.
Laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair are safe and effective after prior
pelvic or low abdominal surgery.
Am J Surg. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.08.011
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to The American Journal of SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Evaluating outcomes for robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair in males with prior urologic surgery: a propensity-matched analysis from a national database.Surg Endosc. 2021; 35 ([doi]): 5310-5314https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08020-6
- Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy: evaluating safety, efficacy, and efficiency.Surgery. 2019; 166 (S0039-6060(19)30316-2 [pii]): 607-614
- Robotic-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair after previous transabdominal prostatectomy.Surg Endosc. 2022; 36 ([doi]): 2105-2112https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08497-9
- Totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients previously having prostatectomy is feasible, safe, and effective.Surg Endosc. 2013; 27 ([doi]): 4485-4490https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3094-1
- Laparoscopic transperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TAPP) after radical open retropubic prostatectomy: special features and clinical outcomes.Hernia. 2019; 23 ([doi]): 281-286https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1846-5
- Laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair are safe and effective after prior pelvic or low abdominal surgery.Am J Surg. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.08.011
- Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair after radical prostatectomy or previous lower abdominal surgery: is it safe? A prospective study.Surg Endosc. 2006; 20 ([doi]): 473-476https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-3027-3
- Totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is a safe option in patients with previous lower abdominal surgery.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2008; 18 ([doi]): 353-356https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2007.0071
- Meta-analysis of totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients with previous lower abdominal surgery.Br J Surg. 2019; 106 ([doi]): 817-823https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11140
Article info
Publication history
Published online: October 20, 2022
Accepted:
October 18,
2022
Received:
October 18,
2022
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofIdentification
Copyright
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
